2021
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quadriceps femoris cross-sectional area and specific leg strength: relationship between different muscles and squat variations

Abstract: Background The aim was to determine the relationship between the cross-sectional area of the quadriceps femoris and strength performance in the deep and parallel barbell squat. Methods The sample included 16 university students (seven female, 24.1 ± 1.7 years). Muscle strength was expressed as external load, including the one-repetition maximum and the body mass segments involved (calculated according to Dempster’s method). The cross-sectio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, ANCOVA analysis revealed no differences between muscles in terms of changes in CSA following the training intervention. This is an important finding considering previous assumptions that squat exercise does not sufficiently target RF among knee extensors [ 4 , 5 , 10 ]. However, it should be noted that the foundation of this concept has been preferably based on the lower electrical activity of RF compared to the vasti muscles during squats although a greater electromyographic response does not imply a greater hypertrophic potential [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, ANCOVA analysis revealed no differences between muscles in terms of changes in CSA following the training intervention. This is an important finding considering previous assumptions that squat exercise does not sufficiently target RF among knee extensors [ 4 , 5 , 10 ]. However, it should be noted that the foundation of this concept has been preferably based on the lower electrical activity of RF compared to the vasti muscles during squats although a greater electromyographic response does not imply a greater hypertrophic potential [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The CSA of four quadriceps muscles (VM, VL, VI, and RF) was assessed using an ultrasound machine (Siemens Antares, Erlangen, Germany) with a variable high-frequency transducer (from 7 MHz to 13 MHz) and an image-fitting technique previously validated by our group [ 10 , 20 ]. Briefly, the RF CSA was measured at the level of three-fifths of the distance between the spina iliaca anterior superior and superior patellar border, whereas the CSA of VI was measured at the halfway point between the spina iliaca anterior superior and the proximal border of the patella.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations