2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QTL detection of production traits for the Kuruma prawn Penaeus japonicus (Bate) using AFLP markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
42
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…monodon [27], P . japonicus [8] and L . vannamei [9], but is almost similar to those generated 7.1 in P .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…monodon [27], P . japonicus [8] and L . vannamei [9], but is almost similar to those generated 7.1 in P .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, genetic mapping of penaeid species has been slow and concentrated mostly on a few important cultured species such as Penaeus monodon [7], P . japonicus [8], L . vannamei [9], and P .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amplification does not require any prior genomic sequence information. In decapod species such as Fenneropenaeus chinensis (Wang et al, 2012), Penaeus japonicas (Li et al, 2006a), Litopenaeus vannamei (Andriantahina et al, 2013) and Portunus trituberculatus , previous linkage maps were constructed mainly relying on AFLP or RAPD markers. However, AFLP and RAPD markers are unknown DNA sequences and should be further converted into reliable sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers when used in QTL location and positional cloning of target genes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the above observations, it was suggested that there would be a relative concentrated region that controlled part of growth traits between 72.603 cM and 73.603 cM po sition on maternal LG1, the linked marker covered in this region was SSR27 with position 72.640 cM on maternal LG1, which separated only by 0.037 cM to QTL q standardl 01 and was one of the co dominant markers containing the richest genetic information. Through IM (interval mapping) and CIM (compound interval mapping) methods, in another similar study, Li et al observed three QTLs associated with body length and weight, carapace length, sharing the same position on paternal LG1 of P. japonicus, along with the smaller variance explained value of carapace than that of body length [40]. Together with this study re sults, it might be concluded that growth related genes concentrated at a certain genome region in shrimps and were all multi effect loci.…”
Section: Qtl Mapping Of Body Length and Other Economic Traits Of F Cmentioning
confidence: 94%