1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00500.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QTL analysis in plants; where are we now?

Abstract: We have briefly reviewed the methods currently available for QTL analysis in segregating populations and summarized some of the conclusions arising from such analyses in plant populations. We show that the analytical methods locate QTL with poor precision (10-30 cM), unless the heritability of an individual QTL is high. Also the estimates of the QTL effects, particularly the dominance effects tend to be inflated because only large estimates are significant. Estimates of numbers of QTL per trait are generally l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

14
215
0
7

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 412 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
14
215
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…A positive impact of such LD is the low marker density required to adequately cover the genome. Conversely, QTL positioning has low resolution such that the marker could be as much as 10-30 cM (centi-Morgans) from the causal allele (Kearsey and Farquhar 1998). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A positive impact of such LD is the low marker density required to adequately cover the genome. Conversely, QTL positioning has low resolution such that the marker could be as much as 10-30 cM (centi-Morgans) from the causal allele (Kearsey and Farquhar 1998). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be noted that the average number of QTL per experiment (4.6) is close and from 15.9 to 9.9 cM on chromosome 10. On average for these loci, use of meta-analysis decreases the size of to that of 4 estimated by Kearsey and Farquhar (1998) over a very wide range of plant species and traits. All confidence intervals by a factor of 1.8 and therefore increases the precision of QTL mapping, which faciliregions of the map, except 4S and 7S, contain QTL involved in the variation of flowering time, although the tates the identification of relevant candidate genes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Almost 80 genes involved sides studies addressing flowering time for its direct interest for maize adaptation to temperate climates (Ragot in the timing of flowering are cloned and described for this species. Genetic, molecular, and physiological analet al 1995), this trait is also frequently scored as a component of yield (Mechin et al 2001), drought stress (Veldyses led to the elaboration of a model of the genetic interactions between these genes (Koornneef et al 1998;boom and Lee 1996), or pest resistance (Bohn et al 2000). A large body of QTL information is therefore Blazquez 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, it would be expected that when markers are not fully informative, information from multiple markers along the chromosome can be used for inferring IBD probabilities using hidden Markov models and this improves the effects of reduced marker heterozygosity. In a literature review [16] regarding QTL analysis in plants, it is shown that more than 50% of all the QTL surveyed gave evidence of a dominance and overdominance mode of gene action as the most plausible models for the dominant QTL. These results, however, are likely due to the significance threshold imposed to declare that a QTL is real, which will cause very large bias in the dominance effects [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a literature review [16] regarding QTL analysis in plants, it is shown that more than 50% of all the QTL surveyed gave evidence of a dominance and overdominance mode of gene action as the most plausible models for the dominant QTL. These results, however, are likely due to the significance threshold imposed to declare that a QTL is real, which will cause very large bias in the dominance effects [16]. So the interpretation of a significant dominance, either a complete or an overdominant model, should be considered with caution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%