Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.3390/plants12010080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

qPCR as a Selective Tool for Cytogenetics

Abstract: qPCR is widely used in quantitative studies of plant genomes and transcriptomes. In this article, this method is considered as an auxiliary step in the preparation and selection of markers for FISH analysis. Several cases from the authors’ research on populations of the same species were reviewed, and a comparison of the closely related species, as well as the adaptation of the markers, based on satellite tandem repeats (TRs) using quantitative qPCR data was conducted. In the selected cases, TRs with contrast … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A wellestablished method for quantifying the number of copies of repetitive DNA, including satellite repeats, is quantitative realtime PCR (qPCR) (Harpke, Peterson, 2007;NavajasPérez et al, 2009;Baruch, Kashkush, 2012;Feliciello et al, 2015;Divashuk et al, 2016Divashuk et al, , 2019Divashuk et al, , 2022Pereiera et al, 2018;Shams, Raskina, 2018). Compared to Southern blot or dot-blot hybridization on a membrane, or fluorescent in situ hybridization on chromosomes, qPCR has proven to be an easier-to-use, accurate, and effective method for assessing the copy number of the target sequence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wellestablished method for quantifying the number of copies of repetitive DNA, including satellite repeats, is quantitative realtime PCR (qPCR) (Harpke, Peterson, 2007;NavajasPérez et al, 2009;Baruch, Kashkush, 2012;Feliciello et al, 2015;Divashuk et al, 2016Divashuk et al, , 2019Divashuk et al, , 2022Pereiera et al, 2018;Shams, Raskina, 2018). Compared to Southern blot or dot-blot hybridization on a membrane, or fluorescent in situ hybridization on chromosomes, qPCR has proven to be an easier-to-use, accurate, and effective method for assessing the copy number of the target sequence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%