2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2015.02.245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QOL Comparison of Acute Side Effects From a High Dose Rate Vs. Low Dose Rate Prostate Brachytherapy Boost Combined With External Beam Radiotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radiotherapy is aimed at delivering the maximum radiation dose to kill tumor cells with minimal complications to normal tissues. However, normal tissues surrounding cancer cells are inevitably exposed to radiation, leading to early and late effects [32,33]. Peripheral neuropathy, one of the major side effects of radiotherapy, can lead to permanent sensory and motor damage in the upper and lower limbs [2,3,4,8,34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiotherapy is aimed at delivering the maximum radiation dose to kill tumor cells with minimal complications to normal tissues. However, normal tissues surrounding cancer cells are inevitably exposed to radiation, leading to early and late effects [32,33]. Peripheral neuropathy, one of the major side effects of radiotherapy, can lead to permanent sensory and motor damage in the upper and lower limbs [2,3,4,8,34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the increased morbidity demonstrated in ASCENDE-RT, another randomized trial in a similar population of patients did not identify any increased Grade 3 + GU toxicity when using a HDR-BT boost up to 8 years post-treatment (13 % vs 7 %; p = 0.2) [33] . In addition, a study directly comparing HDR-BT versus LDR-BT boost found lower toxicity rates with the former, though this was a small and non-randomized study [47] . A larger, single institutional retrospective review also showed a trend towards lower rates of toxicity with HDR-BT versus LDR-BT boost, though this did not reach statistical significance [48] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…There have been no prospective studies comparing these techniques in the reirradiation setting. In the primary treatment setting however prospective and randomised studies have shown HDR-BT to have better quality of life scores compared to LDR-BT in the acute post-treatment phase, particularly in the urinary health domain, which suggests that HDR was better tolerated (64,65). Similarly, evidence from registries and randomised trials of LDR/EBRT combination therapy and HDR/EBRT combination therapy in the primary disease setting suggest that LDR/EBRT might be associated with higher incidence of significant late GU toxicity although no direct comparison has been performed between the two treatments (66)(67)(68).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median number (range) of included patients for individual BT and SBRT studies was 44 ) and 42 (23-100) respectively. The median age (range) at salvage treatment was 70 years (59)(60)(61)(62)(63)(64)(65)(66)(67)(68)(69)(70)(71)(72)(73)(74)(75)(76) for BT studies and 74 years (64-78) for SBRT studies. The median PSA at primary treatment for the BT and SBRT studies were 10.9 ng/mL (range 7.4-26.4) and 10.3 ng/ mL (range 8.7-13.0) respectively.…”
Section: Treatment Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%