2017
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2017.2682236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QoE Driven Decentralized Spectrum Sharing in 5G Networks: Potential Game Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Denote a report not necessarily truthful as ρ l i . 15 All other users report truthfully. Denote the resulting matrix W l when user i reports ρ l i as W l (ρ l i ).…”
Section: F Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Denote a report not necessarily truthful as ρ l i . 15 All other users report truthfully. Denote the resulting matrix W l when user i reports ρ l i as W l (ρ l i ).…”
Section: F Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…To solve this, a fast heuristic algorithm is proposed to reduce computational complexity resulting desired QoS such as latency. In [149], a game theory and interference graph based optimization problem considering user scheduling, power allocation and spectrum access is presented with an aim to maximize user satisfaction across the network. Two algorithms including spatial adaptive play iterative (SAPI) learning are proposed to achieve Nash equilibrium.…”
Section: J Cran and Other Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A jointly design of spectrum sensing and access policies for multi-user QoEoriented video delivery within cognitive radio networks is presented in (He et al, 2016), in which the goal is to achieve fairness among the users while maximizing the average QoE (which is based on throughput). Zhang et al (2017) addressed networks where different types of base stations are deployed to exploit a heterogeneous spectrum pool, containing licensed and harvested spectrum, in order to propose a game-theoretic approach that solves the problem of optimizing the global users' satisfaction (based on their throughput requirement) by jointly optimizing spectrum sharing, user scheduling, and power allocation in a decentralized manner. A framework is devised in (Piran et al, 2017) that has the goal of managing the inevitable spectrum handoff within cognitive networks while providing seamless multimedia content streaming and QoE enhancement (namely by taking into consideration the delay and the quality of the multimedia content).…”
Section: Heterogeneous Cognitive Radio Relay and Multi-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uplink (Essaili et al, 2011;Wu et al, 2012;Condoluci et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2018;Ranjan et al, 2018) Multi-cell (Zheng et al, 2014;Cho et al, 2015;Kim et al, 2015;Miller et al, 2015) Heterogeneous networks (Toseef et al, 2011;Jailton et al, 2013;Seyedebrahimi and Peng, 2015;Morel and Randriamasy, 2017;Abbas et al, 2017) Device-to-device communications (Zhu et al, 2015a;Hong et al, 2017;Biswash and Jayakody, 2018) Vehicular networks (Xu et al, 2013;Yaacoub et al, 2015;Ding et al, 2018) Cognitive radio networks (Jiang et al, 2012;Wu et al, 2013;He et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2017;Piran et al, 2017;Lin et al, 2017) Relay networks (Reis et al, 2010;Wu et al, 2013;Bethanabhotla et al, 2016;Xiang et al, 2017;Fan and Zhao, 2018) Multi-user MIMO networks (Cao et al, 2012;Bethanabhotla et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2017;Huang and Zhang, 2018) Base stations energy consumption (Ma et al, 2012;Li et al, 2012;Gabale and Subramanian, 2014;Draxler et al, 2014;Sapountzis et al, 2014;…”
Section: Scope Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%