2017
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijepe.20170606.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pyrolytic Conversion of Olive Mill Wastewater Sludge to Biofuels Using Red Mud as Catalyst

Abstract: Abstract:Olive mill wastewater sludge (OMWS) is an environmental pollutant in olive oil industry. The problem stems from the strong odor and poor biodegradability of OMWS because of its high phenolic compounds. In most Mediterranean countries, olive mill wastewater is stored in evaporation ponds and the residual sludge is landfilled for disposal. To address this environmental pollution problem, fluidized bed catalytic pyrolysis of OMWS was developed to produce pyrolysis liquids that are stable, low viscosity (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The XRD analyses of the raw red mud (fresh) and calcined FRM catalysts before and after pyrolysis show that the major changes occurred in each stage of the treatment. After calcination, the FRM lost some peaks that were attributed to gibbsite (Al(OH) 3 ) and goethite (FeO(OH)) due to dehydration of these components as reported by Agblevor et al 88 After pyrolysis, there were major changes in the structure of the catalyst due to the conversion of almost all the hematite component to magnetite (see Supporting Information, Figure S1). Even though biochar and coke were on the surface of the used catalyst, there was no significant difference in the XRD spectra of the regenerated and used catalysts.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The XRD analyses of the raw red mud (fresh) and calcined FRM catalysts before and after pyrolysis show that the major changes occurred in each stage of the treatment. After calcination, the FRM lost some peaks that were attributed to gibbsite (Al(OH) 3 ) and goethite (FeO(OH)) due to dehydration of these components as reported by Agblevor et al 88 After pyrolysis, there were major changes in the structure of the catalyst due to the conversion of almost all the hematite component to magnetite (see Supporting Information, Figure S1). Even though biochar and coke were on the surface of the used catalyst, there was no significant difference in the XRD spectra of the regenerated and used catalysts.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodssupporting
confidence: 54%