2020
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.6326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pyrite enhanced the reactivity of zero‐valent iron for reductive removal of dyes

Abstract: BACKGROUND Zero‐valent iron (ZVI) is an environmentally friendly and cost‐efficient material for the removal of contaminants. However, its application is challenged by problems such as surface passivation and pH increase in the reaction media. As a potential solution for this problem, pyrite, a waste of the mining industry, was used together with ZVI for reductive removal of azo dyes. RESULTS In comparison with ZVI alone, the ZVI/pyrite mixture showed dramatically enhanced efficiency and reusability for dye re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, mixing Fe-sulfides and Fe 0 corresponds to mixing two reducing agents, and should result in even more reducing systems (without considering the pH shift capacity of Fe-sulfides). Yet studies have been published comparing the relative kinetics and extent of contaminant removal in the following three systems: (i) Fe-sulfide alone, (ii) Fe 0 alone and (iii) the Fe 0 /Fe-sulfide mixture [18,47,48,52,53,55,56,82]. For example, Lü et al [18] observed no nitrobenzene removal in the pure FeS 2 system, moderate removal in the pure Fe 0 system and increased removal in the Fe 0 /FeS 2 system.…”
Section: Contaminant Removal In Fe 0 /Fe-sulfide/h 2 O Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, mixing Fe-sulfides and Fe 0 corresponds to mixing two reducing agents, and should result in even more reducing systems (without considering the pH shift capacity of Fe-sulfides). Yet studies have been published comparing the relative kinetics and extent of contaminant removal in the following three systems: (i) Fe-sulfide alone, (ii) Fe 0 alone and (iii) the Fe 0 /Fe-sulfide mixture [18,47,48,52,53,55,56,82]. For example, Lü et al [18] observed no nitrobenzene removal in the pure FeS 2 system, moderate removal in the pure Fe 0 system and increased removal in the Fe 0 /FeS 2 system.…”
Section: Contaminant Removal In Fe 0 /Fe-sulfide/h 2 O Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its misleading nature, the term "reactivity loss" is partly maintained here, for the sake of clarity. Several tools have been introduced to address "reactivity loss" [15,37,[44][45][46][47][48], including the amendment of granular Fe 0 with granular iron sulfide minerals, which is the focus of the current study. Other tools as summarized by Lü et al [18] include using the following: fabrication of (dispersed) nanoscale Fe 0 , multi-metallic materials, weak magnetic field and the fabrication of several Fe 0 -based composites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clearly, reports justifying the reductive efficiency of Fe 0 /H 2 O systems using the semi-conductive nature of FeCPs are mistaken [96]. This assertion encompasses the Fe 0 /pyrite/H 2 O system, whose efficiency is mainly justified by the semi-conductive nature of FeS species [97][98][99].…”
Section: Oxide Scale On Fe 0 and The Decontamination Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several hybrid systems have been successfully tested for water treatment including Fe 0 /activated carbon [184], Fe 0 /Fe 3 O 4 [185], Fe 0 /MnO 2 [186], Fe 0 /pyrite [99] and Fe 0 /sand [187]. While inert sand alone has clearly improved the efficiency of Fe 0 systems [188], the efficiency of other tested aggregates was attributed to the specific materials.…”
Section: Designing the Next Generation Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%