2010
DOI: 10.1021/jm100843z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pyrimidine Derivatives as Potent and Selective A3 Adenosine Receptor Antagonists

Abstract: Two regioisomeric series of diaryl 2- or 4-amidopyrimidines have been synthesized and their adenosine receptor affinities were determined in radioligand binding assays at the four human adenosine receptors (hARs). Some of the ligands prepared herein exhibit remarkable affinities (K(i) < 10 nm) and, most noticeably, the absence of activity at the A(1), A(2A), and A(2B) receptors. The structural determinants that support the affinity and selectivity profiles of the series were highlighted through an integrated c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The A 3 AR homology model based on an inactive GPCR structure (rhodopsin), still provided useful insights into agonist recognition. A larger than expected gap between His272 and the 3′-OH of agonists (4.21 Å) was speculated to be the site of an interposed water molecule [30]. Retrospectively, it is more likely that the conformational tightening of the receptor residues around the ribose moiety in the agonist-bound structure [35] would explain this gap in the previous model.…”
Section: Structural Probing Of the A3 Adenosine Receptormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The A 3 AR homology model based on an inactive GPCR structure (rhodopsin), still provided useful insights into agonist recognition. A larger than expected gap between His272 and the 3′-OH of agonists (4.21 Å) was speculated to be the site of an interposed water molecule [30]. Retrospectively, it is more likely that the conformational tightening of the receptor residues around the ribose moiety in the agonist-bound structure [35] would explain this gap in the previous model.…”
Section: Structural Probing Of the A3 Adenosine Receptormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most hA 3 AR antagonists (17–23, Figure 2) were discovered empirically, by one of three methods: (1) structural modification of a known AR antagonist to bind selectively to the hA 3 AR (e.g., 17 and 22 from [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5- c ]quinazolin-5-amine and 21a and 21b from 8-phenylxanthines); (2) VS of medium to large chemical libraries to identify and optimize binding hits (1,4-dihydropyridines 18 and 19 , pyridine 20 and pyrimidine 23 ); and (3) modification of agonist ligands to reduce relative efficacy in receptor activation without losing binding affinity or A 3 AR selectivity (e.g., antagonist 4) [6,21,2830]. Typically, radiolabeled 125 I agonist I-AB-MECA is used in binding assays [14], but antagonist [ 3 H] 22 has also been utilized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pyrimidine moiety is commonly present in various bioactive small molecules, and it plays a critical role as a nucleoside analogue in various kinase inhibitors or adenosine receptor modulators due to its hydrogen bonding ability (Fig. 1a)202122. Therefore, many synthetic efforts towards pyrimidine-containing species have been focused on aromatic monocyclic or bicyclic skeletons, which limits the structural diversity of the pyrimidine-containing core skeletons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intriguingly, several pyrimidine derivatives are potent antagonists of adenosine receptors including A3AR, and in some cases are reverse agonists (Baraldi, 1996;Baraldi, 1998;Chebib, 2000;Chang, 2004;Moro, 2006;Wei, 2009;Taliani, 2010;Yaziji, 2011). The derivatives vary in potency, yet the pyrimidine heteroaromatic core appears necessary for antagonistic activity (Chang, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%