2018
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.17347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pyoderma gangrenosum and its impact on quality of life: a multicentre, prospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
28
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean DLQI in our study was 8.6 (±7.6, range: 0‐29), reflecting a moderate effect of PG on quality of life (Table 5). Previous studies reported DLQI scores of 8.4‐15.0 1 . Presence of pain with PG has been shown to be a strong contributor to increasing DLQI scores in previous studies, and our data reflected the same 1,3 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mean DLQI in our study was 8.6 (±7.6, range: 0‐29), reflecting a moderate effect of PG on quality of life (Table 5). Previous studies reported DLQI scores of 8.4‐15.0 1 . Presence of pain with PG has been shown to be a strong contributor to increasing DLQI scores in previous studies, and our data reflected the same 1,3 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…1 Presence of pain with PG has been shown to be a strong contributor to increasing DLQI scores in previous studies, and our data reflected the same. 1,3 In our study, SATMED-Q scores decreased linearly with increased pain level, and increased linearly with satisfaction with pain control (Table 4). 10 Those whose pain control was provided by dermatologists vs other specialties had higher SATMED-Q scores (79.2 ± 11.5 vs 73.7 ± 17.4, respectively) (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 Studies relating to PG are also challenged by the lack of a PGspecific severity scale and validated tools for assessing the effectiveness, efficacy and safety of therapeutics. [3][4][5] This results in the absence of a uniform therapeutic standard of care, complicating treatment selections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, treatment options are limited and nonstandardized due to the scarcity of validated outcome measurement instruments for PG, as well as the limited number of clinical trials and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) 3. Studies relating to PG are also challenged by the lack of a PG‐specific severity scale and validated tools for assessing the effectiveness, efficacy and safety of therapeutics 3–5. This results in the absence of a uniform therapeutic standard of care, complicating treatment selections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%