2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

pXRF: a study of inter-instrument performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
49
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Inter-instrument performance of pXRF equipment has proved that between different instruments statistically identical results are not produced (Goodale et al 2012). Numerous highlighted limitations in the archaeological application of pXRF are recognised such as low precision, variable analytical accuracy, lack of instrument calibration and data correction, ignorance of surface morphology effects and difficulties with quantification due to a lack of appropriate standards (Goodale et al 2012;Frahm 2013).…”
Section: Archaeological Dung Research Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inter-instrument performance of pXRF equipment has proved that between different instruments statistically identical results are not produced (Goodale et al 2012). Numerous highlighted limitations in the archaeological application of pXRF are recognised such as low precision, variable analytical accuracy, lack of instrument calibration and data correction, ignorance of surface morphology effects and difficulties with quantification due to a lack of appropriate standards (Goodale et al 2012;Frahm 2013).…”
Section: Archaeological Dung Research Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous highlighted limitations, such as low precision, variable analytical accuracy, lack of instrument calibration and data correction. Also ignorance of the effects of surface morphology and difficulties with quantification due to a lack of appropriate standards can all negatively impact results ( Goodale et al 2012;Frahm 2013). When compared with laboratory-based XRF, the results have been found to be comparable for some elements (e.g.…”
Section: Portable X-ray Fluorescence (Pxrf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hay debate en la literatura arqueológica sobre la confiabilidad de la pistola portátil de FRX (Shackley 2011;Goodale et al 2012;Speakman y Shackley 2013;Johnson 2014;Hunt y Speakman 2015).…”
Section: Materiales Y Métodosunclassified