2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-37288-9_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Putting together What Fits together - GrÆStl

Abstract: Abstract. We present GrAEStl, a combined hardware architecture for the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) and Grøstl, one of the final round candidates of the SHA-3 hash competition. GrAEStl has been designed for low-resource devices implementing AES-128 (encryption and decryption) as well as Grøstl-256 (tweaked version). We applied several resource-sharing optimizations and based our design on an 8/16-bit datapath. As a feature, we aim for high flexibility by targeting both ASIC and FPGA platforms and do not … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is evident from the comparison table that our Base Module provides a balance solution such as utilized optimal number of area resources and offered highest throughput. Although area resources of our proposed Base Module is greater than these low-area designs [30]- [32], but enables much higher throughput figures. It is a known fact that area of design can be reduced by folding techniques at the cost of high latency that eventually degrades the performance.…”
Section: B Comparison With Resource-shared Implementationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is evident from the comparison table that our Base Module provides a balance solution such as utilized optimal number of area resources and offered highest throughput. Although area resources of our proposed Base Module is greater than these low-area designs [30]- [32], but enables much higher throughput figures. It is a known fact that area of design can be reduced by folding techniques at the cost of high latency that eventually degrades the performance.…”
Section: B Comparison With Resource-shared Implementationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Fugue was a secondround candidate that got eliminated due to security flaws and its average throughput-to-area ratio [7]. Other studies [8][9][10][11] have implemented resource-shared AES with Grøstl-256 on different FPGA platforms. Compared to Keccak, Grøstl-256 has relatively small security margins, lower throughput, throughput/area, and energy consumption-per-bit on FPGAs and ASICs [12].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%