2002
DOI: 10.1177/0093854802029004007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Putting the “What Works” Research into Practice

Abstract: Significant advances have been made in correctional research over the past decade. The research has highlighted the key elements of effective correctional assessment and treatment. However, organizations that wish to engage in effective correctional services by implementing the findings of correctional research have been given minimal practical guidance. This article discusses the experience of one probation department and its implementation of a risk and needs assessment tool as part of the daily practice of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
62
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, findings from evaluations of recent large scale criminal justice reforms, such as the Home Office Crime Reduction Program in England and Wales, indicate that problems during implementation of new correctional programs and services significantly influence treatment outcomes (Furniss & Nutley, 2000;Mair, 2004;Merrington & Stanley, 2000;Raynor, 2004). Similar experiences have been reported in Canada and the United States (Bernfeld, Farrington & Leschied, 2001;Bourgon & Armstrong, 2005;Farabee et al, 1999;Ferguson, 2002;Petersilia, 1990). These studies suggest that basing correctional programs on good research and theories is not enough.…”
Section: Getting "What Work" To "Work": the Challenge Of Implementationsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…For example, findings from evaluations of recent large scale criminal justice reforms, such as the Home Office Crime Reduction Program in England and Wales, indicate that problems during implementation of new correctional programs and services significantly influence treatment outcomes (Furniss & Nutley, 2000;Mair, 2004;Merrington & Stanley, 2000;Raynor, 2004). Similar experiences have been reported in Canada and the United States (Bernfeld, Farrington & Leschied, 2001;Bourgon & Armstrong, 2005;Farabee et al, 1999;Ferguson, 2002;Petersilia, 1990). These studies suggest that basing correctional programs on good research and theories is not enough.…”
Section: Getting "What Work" To "Work": the Challenge Of Implementationsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Recently, a fourth generation of offender assessment tools has evolved that includes measures of the severity of a given problem area (e.g., substance use disorder, antisocial personality, psychopathy) to improve the level of match between need and service interventions (Andrews, Bonta, & Wormith, 2006;Ferguson, 2002;Jones, Harris, Fader, & Grubstein, 2001). With these advances, the concept of risk is one that focuses attention on the severity of the offending behavior given the lifestyle and needs of the offender.…”
Section: Assessments For Criminal Justice Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These principles (as defined below) conjoin to identify both the proper targets for rehabilitation and the appropriate approaches to treatment (Ferguson, 2002). Programs that have adhered to the principles of RNR have significantly reduced recidivism rates by up to 60% (Gendreau, 1996a).…”
Section: Risk Need and Responsivity In Substance Abuse Treatment: Bmentioning
confidence: 99%