Push-pull plus: reconsidering the drivers of migration

Abstract

Drivers can be understood as forces leading to the inception of migration and the perpetuation of movement. This article considers key drivers of migration and explores different ways that they may be configured. We modify existing explanations of migration to generate a framework which we call push-pull plus. To understand migration flows better, analysts could usefully distinguish between predisposing, proximate, precipitating and mediating drivers. Combinations of such drivers shape the conditions, circumstances and environment within which people choose to move or stay put, or have that decision thrust upon them. In any one migration flow, several driver complexes may interconnect to shape the eventual direction and nature of movement. The challenge is to establish when and why some drivers are more important than others, which combinations are more potent than others, and which are more susceptible to change through external intervention. Drawing on Afghan and Somali movements featuring 'mixed migration', the article concludes that proximate and mediating drivers, rather than those in the structural and precipitating spheres, appear to offer greater potential for intervention. To be effective, though, migration policy should be understood not simply as a stand-alone lever, but within the wider political economy.

Far from a Burden: EU Migrants as Pioneers of a European Social Protection System from Below

“…In that respect, this is in line with Van Hear et al. 's () drivers of migration framework among which mediating drivers can enable, facilitate, constrain, accelerate, consolidate or even diminish migration (see p. 932) with transnational welfare policies in this case enabling return migration. For the moment, according to the son, ‘no one needs help from anyone’.…”

Who’s About to Leave? A Global Survey of Aspirations and Intentions to Migrate

“…Aspirations and intentions to migrate have been analysed from both qualitative and quantitative angles (Docquier et al, ; Thulin and Vilhelmson, ; Gubert and Senne, ; Van Hear et al, ; Carling and Schewel, ; Carling and Collins, ; Dao et al, ; Williams et al, ). Many quantitative studies have tapped into the Gallup World Poll (among others, see Esipova et al, ; Docquier et al, ; Esipova et al, ; Cai et al, ; Bertoli and Ruyssen, ; Dao et al, ; Tjaden et al, ), but other examples have focused on, e.g.…”

Effects of the Geographical Distance on Economic Well-being: Evidence from Colombia with Emphasis on Displaced Population

“…For many of these migrants, it is a challenge not only to find ways to match their living conditions before forced displacement, but they do not have the opportunities to overcome the living conditions of those most impoverished locals (Ruiz and Vargas-Silva, 2013;Silva and Massey, 2015;Lozano-Garcia et al, 2010). Despite the extensive literature around the determinants of migration (De Haas, 2010;Buch et al, 2014;Beine and Parsons, 2015;Bodvarsson et al, 2015;Sirkeci and Cohen, 2016;Kondoh, 2017;Mintchev et al, 2017;Carling and Collins, 2018;Van Hear et al, 2018), a less explored topic is the relationship between armed conflicts and the economic performance of migrants (Serneels and Verpoorten, 2015;Fiala, 2015). As we are not aware of any empirical study that has tackled the influence that geographical distance has on the economic well-being of displaced people, our goal here is to provide some preliminary analyses to shed lights in filling this gap.…”