Push‐out bond strength of root fillings made with C‐Point and <scp>BC</scp> sealer versus gutta‐percha and <scp>AH</scp> Plus after the instrumentation of oval canals with the Self‐Adjusting File versus WaveOne

Pawar, Ajinkya; Pawar, Suraj; Kfir, Anda; Pawar, Mansing; Kokate, Sharad R

doi:10.1111/iej.12455

Cited by 33 publications

(53 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…15 It is also reported that the SAF system was associated with cleaner radicular walls (free of debris) apically. 31 There is no study reported in literature using SAF in primary teeth; hence, this file was included in this study as it is being advantageous in permanent teeth. The apparatus used in this study was based on the one developed by Myers and Montgomery.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Extrusion of Debris from Primary Molar Root Canals following Instrumentation with Traditional and New File Systems

Thakur

Kfir

Neelakantan

2017

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction:To assess the amount of debris extruded apically during instrumentation of distal canals of extracted primary molars by three instrument systems [ProTaper Universal (PTU), ProTaper NEXT (PTN), and self-adjusting file (SAF)] compared with conventional stainless steel hand K-files (HF, control). Materials and methods:Primary mandibular molars (n = 120) with a single distal canal were selected and randomly divided into four groups (n = 30) for root canal instrumentation using group I, HF (to size 0.30/0.02 taper), group II, PTU (to size F3), group III, PTN (to size X3), and group IV, SAF. Debris extruded during instrumentation was collected in preweighed Eppendorf tubes, stored in an incubator at 70°C for 5 days and then weighed. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Turkey's post hoc test (p = 0.05).Results: All the groups resulted in extrusion of debris. There was statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in the debris extrusion between the three groups: HF (0.00133 ± 0.00012), PTU (0.00109 ± 0.00005), PTN (0.00052 ± 0.00008), and SAF (0.00026 ± 0.00004). Conclusion:Instrumentation with SAF resulted in the least debris extrusion when used for shaping root canals of primary molar teeth. Clinical significance: Debris extrusion in primary teeth poses an adverse effect on the stem cells and may also alter the permanent dental germ. Debris extrusion is rarely reported for primary teeth and it is important for the clinician to know which endodontic instrumentation leads to less extrusion of debris. Extrusion of Debris from Primary Molar Root

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Extrusion of Debris from Primary Molar Root Canals following Instrumentation with Traditional and New File Systems

Thakur

Kfir

Neelakantan

2017

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…, Pawar et al . ). The penetration of AH Plus into dentinal tubules after polymerization may explain the superior results of the push‐out bond strength, as observed in laboratory studies when compared to other sealers (Tedesco et al .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Wear profile of canal wall surfaces and bond strength of endodontic sealers after in situ acid challenge

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The use of Bioceramic cones, ActiV GP or C-Point might have helped to increase the bonding strength. C-Point with Endoequence BC Sealer, according to Pawar et al [ 21 ] is claimed to push the sealer radially, enabling a more intimate adaptation with the irregular spaces of canal walls.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Push-Out Bond Strength and SEM Evaluation in Roots Filled with Two Different Techniques Using New and Conventional Sealers

Dabaj¹,

Kalender²,

Eldeniz

2018

Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of calcium-silicate-based sealer (Endosequence-BC-Sealer) in roots, filled with thermo-plasticized injectable technique aided by Calamus-Flow-Delivery-System, on bond strength to radicular dentin, in comparison with conventional epoxy-resin-based sealer (AH-Plus) along with cold-lateral-compaction technique. Root canals of mandibular-premolar teeth (n = 80) were instrumented using Protaper Universal rotary files and were randomly divided into four experimental groups (n = 20) as follows: (1) AH-Plus + cold-lateral-compaction technique; (2) Endosequence-BC-Sealer + cold-lateral-compaction technique; (3) AH-Plus + thermo-plasticized injectable technique; and (4) Endosequence-BC-Sealer + thermo-plasticized injectable technique. Horizontal disc shaped samples from each group (n = 60/group) were obtained and push-out bond strength testing was performed at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed statistically using nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis and Mann-Whitney test (p < 0.001). The statistical analysis revealed a significant difference amongst the groups (p < 0.001). The highest bond strength values were found in group 1 compared with all the other experimental groups (p < 0.001), whereas the lowest bond strength values were found in group 4 (p < 0.001). It was concluded that thermo-plasticized injectable technique with Calamus-Flow-Delivery-System lowered the bond strengths of the sealers, especially Endosequence-BC-Sealer. Therefore, this technique is not recommended to calcium-silicate-based sealers. Further studies are needed to confirm the findings of this study.

show abstract

Push‐out bond strength of root fillings made with C‐Point and BC sealer versus gutta‐percha and AH Plus after the instrumentation of oval canals with the Self‐Adjusting File versus WaveOne

Cited by 33 publications

References 35 publications

Extrusion of Debris from Primary Molar Root Canals following Instrumentation with Traditional and New File Systems

Extrusion of Debris from Primary Molar Root Canals following Instrumentation with Traditional and New File Systems

Wear profile of canal wall surfaces and bond strength of endodontic sealers after in situ acid challenge

Push-Out Bond Strength and SEM Evaluation in Roots Filled with Two Different Techniques Using New and Conventional Sealers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About