2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.pep.2012.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purification and separation of the 20S immunoproteasome from the constitutive proteasome and identification of the subunits by LC–MS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, studies have assessed the involvement of the total proteasome population of a cell to determine the roles of these complexes in lung diseases 9 , 45 . With the advent of novel techniques that can target and purify immunoproteasomes, improved assessment of their role in disease conditions will be possible 69 . Furthermore, it will be important to differentiate between the immunoproteasome and mixed proteasome populations in order to attain more conclusive results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, studies have assessed the involvement of the total proteasome population of a cell to determine the roles of these complexes in lung diseases 9 , 45 . With the advent of novel techniques that can target and purify immunoproteasomes, improved assessment of their role in disease conditions will be possible 69 . Furthermore, it will be important to differentiate between the immunoproteasome and mixed proteasome populations in order to attain more conclusive results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, constitutive proteasomes are ubiquitously present in all tissue types and even low amounts can interfere with immunoproteasome-specific research. Dechavanne et al (2013) report that hydrophobic interaction chromatography can successfully separate immunoproteasomes from residual constitutive proteasome contamination after purification.…”
Section: Methods For Pharmacological Proteasome Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard-, immuno-and intermediate-proteasomes can be separated due to their differences in surface hydrophobicity (Kloss et al 2009;Dechavanne et al 2013). Accordingly, we have subjected rat liver 20S proteasomes to hydrophobic interaction chromatography and thereby dividing them into three subpopulations designated Ι, ΙΙ, and ΙΙΙ with subpopulation Ι being the predominant form of 20S proteasomes (Fig.…”
Section: Separation Of 20s Proteasome Into Subpopulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%