2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purchasing professional services: A transaction cost view of the antecedents and consequences of purchasing formalization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Management consultants also play an increasingly central role in organizations, providing strategically important knowledge and innovation, and large sums are spent on their services each year (FEACO, ). Skillful purchasing of management consulting services has therefore become important in relation to organizations' competitive advantage (Pemer et al., ). However, the procurement of management consulting services has traditionally been performed by senior client managers without the involvement of purchasing professionals (Sieweke et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Management consultants also play an increasingly central role in organizations, providing strategically important knowledge and innovation, and large sums are spent on their services each year (FEACO, ). Skillful purchasing of management consulting services has therefore become important in relation to organizations' competitive advantage (Pemer et al., ). However, the procurement of management consulting services has traditionally been performed by senior client managers without the involvement of purchasing professionals (Sieweke et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing research has shown that, although using formalized PSM practices is relatively well established for goods and simpler services such as cleaning and catering, the purchasing of complex and knowledge‐intensive services proves more difficult (Pemer, Werr & Bianchi, ). One explanation for this is that indirect spend, of which knowledge‐intensive services are particularly illuminating examples (Eisenhardt & Graebner, ), is characterized by fragmentation, maverick buying, and long‐term relations (Cox et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The focus on relationship‐building as an object of analysis has also been established beyond doubt, a unit of analysis that is much more comprehensive and detailed and in stark contrast with the notion of a mere transaction as the unit of analysis in B2B interactions. However, transaction research is still being conducted, especially from the perspective on how more transactions impact relationships (Pemer et al., ; Wallman, ).…”
Section: From Transactions To Relationships: a Paradigm Shiftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important precursor to the formation of interfirm relationships is the selection of transaction partners. In the case of buyer–supplier relationships, partner selection may be centralized (e.g., with business units required to buy from company‐designated suppliers), or decentralized (e.g., with business units given the autonomy to select a supplier) (McCabe ; Sieweke, Birkner, and Mohe ; Pemer, Werr, and Bianchi ) . We use motivated reasoning theory (Kunda ) to hypothesize that having the autonomy to select suppliers will have a positive effect on the buyer's initial trust, all else equal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%