Purchasing Policy Advice: The Limits to Contracting Out

Abstract

Throughout the OECD, governments have been contracting out an increasing range of goods and services. Against this background, this article outlines the case for, and assesses the merits of, placing the purchase of governmental policy advice on a more competitive basis. Two options are given particular attention: first, the creation of an internal market for policy advice within the public sector under which departments and other government agencies would tender to supply specific policy outputs; and second, a more radical option under which public and private sector organizations would compete for the contracts to supply governmental policy advice. Drawing on the insights of the new institutional economics, it is argued that neither option is likely to enhance the efficiency or effectiveness with which policy advice is produced, whether under conditions of shortterm or long-term contracting. This is due to the likelihood of: only partial contestability (due, among other things, to asset specificity in the form of transaction-specific expertise and trust); a greater risk of opportunistic behavior by the suppliers of advice (and also, under some conditions, by the purchasers); higher agency costs and transaction costs; and greater problems with respect to horizontal and vertical policy coordination. Such considerations suggest that the widespread reliance of governments on relatively permanent advisory institutions and in-house expertise can be explained and justified on the same theoretical grounds that have prompted the contracting out of other publicly-funded goods and services.Since the early 1980s policymakers in many countries have been significantly influenced by what Hood (1990) has called the "new public management" and by various economics-based approaches to administrative analysis. This has led to the privatization of many publiclyowned enterprises, the contracting out of numerous publicly-funded goods and services, a growing reliance on short-term employment contracts and performance-based pay, and a move away from the provision of public services by a single provider in favor of competitive, multipleprovider structures (

Transnational learning, policy analytical capacity, and environmental policy convergence: Survey results from Canada

“…This is typically gathered by analysts who must have the capability or capacity to collect appropriate data and ideas and make them useable in the course of policy-making activities. These policy functions require either a highly trained, and hence expensive, workforce that has far-seeing and future-oriented management and excellent information collection and data processing capacities, as well as the opportunity for employees to strengthen their skills and expertise (O'Connor et al, 2007) or the ability to outsource policy research to similarly qualified personnel in private or semi-public organizations such as universities, think tanks, research institutes and consultancies (Boston, 1994;Anderson, 1996). It also requires sufficient vertical and horizontal coordination between participating organizations to ensure that the research being undertaken is relevant and timely.…”

Integrating Financial Management and Performance Management

“…"Ideal" and regulatory services are even more problematic -taking policy advice as an example, while it is perfectly possible to establish performance targets in terms of timeliness and comprehensibility, that is not at all the same thing as the underlying quality of the advice. Attempts have been made -notably in New Zealand -but, however one judges their success, it remains the case that price/quality trades-off are easier to measure and to comprehend with tangible, standardised products (Boston, 1994;Pollitt and Bouckaert).…”

The Steering Group as Policy Advice Instrument: A Case of “Consultocracy” in Stadium Subsidy Deliberations

“…Boston (1994) uses the term "policy advice" to encompass various analytical mechanisms, from far-reaching commissions of inquiry about the state's role in society to more modest statistical reports about individual policy programmes. Since New Zealand's passage of the State Sector Act in 1988, and consistent with the rise of New Public Management principles (Hood, 1991), national level departments have made frequent use of private consultants to secure policy advice on a broad range of matters including those related to organisational re-structuring, economic forecasting and leadership training.…”