2015
DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.167765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulsed electrical stimulation protects neurons in the dorsal root and anterior horn of the spinal cord after peripheral nerve injury

Abstract: Most studies on peripheral nerve injury have focused on repair at the site of injury, but very few have examined the effects of repair strategies on the more proximal neuronal cell bodies. In this study, an approximately 10-mm-long nerve segment from the ischial tuberosity in the rat was transected and its proximal and distal ends were inverted and sutured. The spinal cord was subjected to pulsed electrical stimulation at T10 and L3, at a current of 6.5 mA and a stimulation frequency of 15 Hz, 15 minutes per s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results may also be due to changes in the dorsal horn neurons or more proximal structures. It has been reported in animal studies that after SN injury, there are changes in the dorsal root ganglion and spinal cord, or the neurons in the dorsal root ganglion and spinal cord are protected by electrical stimulation [ 29 - 31 ]. Moreover, changes in the dorsal horn neurons were reported as a result of tibial nerve section in rats [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results may also be due to changes in the dorsal horn neurons or more proximal structures. It has been reported in animal studies that after SN injury, there are changes in the dorsal root ganglion and spinal cord, or the neurons in the dorsal root ganglion and spinal cord are protected by electrical stimulation [ 29 - 31 ]. Moreover, changes in the dorsal horn neurons were reported as a result of tibial nerve section in rats [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%