2021
DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.1.124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between nerve conduction studies and neuropathic pain in sciatic nerve injury due to intramuscular injection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, our study reported that moderate hot compression starting a week after the injury can effectively attenuate the infiltration of inflammatory factors in the affected area, which implies that periodic and continuous hot compression promotes vasoconstriction, and blood circulation contributes to nerve acceleration to the recovery phase. Furthermore, a recent study reported that a physical squeezing-induced nerve injury model produced large changes in the CMAP amplitude prior to large changes in the conduction velocity ( Stecker et al, 2008 ; Fidancı and Öztürk, 2021 ). Therefore, we used CMAP electrophysiological testing to evaluate the therapeutic effects of hot compress treatment in the CCI model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, our study reported that moderate hot compression starting a week after the injury can effectively attenuate the infiltration of inflammatory factors in the affected area, which implies that periodic and continuous hot compression promotes vasoconstriction, and blood circulation contributes to nerve acceleration to the recovery phase. Furthermore, a recent study reported that a physical squeezing-induced nerve injury model produced large changes in the CMAP amplitude prior to large changes in the conduction velocity ( Stecker et al, 2008 ; Fidancı and Öztürk, 2021 ). Therefore, we used CMAP electrophysiological testing to evaluate the therapeutic effects of hot compress treatment in the CCI model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,41,73 Pain was reported to have a high incidence in neuropathic patients showing abnormalities in nerve conduction studies, although these tests only provide information on impairment of Ab fibers. 31,33 Commonly used medications, such as gabapentin, lamotrigine, or pyridoxine plus pyridostigmine, showed low efficacy against neuropathic pain in random clinical trials. 55,62,89 Previously, several attempts have been performed to treat or prevent CIN with various neuroprotective drugs, but most of them are either ineffective or cause neurological side effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 5 , 41 , 73 Pain was reported to have a high incidence in neuropathic patients showing abnormalities in nerve conduction studies, although these tests only provide information on impairment of Aβ fibers. 31 , 33 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful neurorrhaphy is not a matter of simple surgical judgement regarding the apparent clinical alignment of the proximal and distal ends of the nerve, or what can be considered a tension free suture, it must be based on sound measures. One of the well-established reliable methods is the use of electromyography measurements to detect nerve conduction as, latency in conduction in milliseconds, amplitude of voltage in millivoltages and reaction of degeneration [17][18][19] . Immunohistochemical examination of the repaired segment is another sound prove of nerve regeneration that has been used in many studies [20][21][22] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%