2014
DOI: 10.3233/jae-141842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulsed eddy current detection of cracks in F/A-18 inner wing spar at large lift-off using modified principal component analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As demonstrated in the subsection above, the first two eigenvectors are the most associated with the sample thickness, while the third and fourth eigenvectors can be associated with the cladding thickness. This solution, however, is still limited as the third eigenvector still accounts for the sample thickness, owing to the second peak of the eigenvector at 0.025 s. Motivated by this, the solution can be rotated, so that the variances are redistributed among the rotated components, as was done in previous work [19]. Rotation in PCA is normally done so that each eigenvector can be associated with at most one factor only.…”
Section: Pca Rotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As demonstrated in the subsection above, the first two eigenvectors are the most associated with the sample thickness, while the third and fourth eigenvectors can be associated with the cladding thickness. This solution, however, is still limited as the third eigenvector still accounts for the sample thickness, owing to the second peak of the eigenvector at 0.025 s. Motivated by this, the solution can be rotated, so that the variances are redistributed among the rotated components, as was done in previous work [19]. Rotation in PCA is normally done so that each eigenvector can be associated with at most one factor only.…”
Section: Pca Rotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example that is close to the work carried out here is the application of PCA to separate the signal effects of tubes degradation with those of ferromagnetic support, as reported by Buck et al [17], owing to the large difference in the "relaxation times" for eddy current diffusion in the tube compared to those of the ferromagnetic support. Similar effort has also been carried out to detect loose parts in steam generator [18] and cracks in inner wing spar of an F/A-18 Hornet aircraft [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCA/ICA‐based method is an obvious improvement [105]. PEC, generated by a probe design that utilises the ferrous fastener as a flux conduit, are demonstrated to have capability of detecting simulated cracks within the spar with the wing skin present.…”
Section: Crack Defect Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stored eigenvectors and discriminant functions from calibration measurements then allow for nearinstantaneous (∼1ms) real time crack discrimination of samples of unknown condition. This permits for inspection times on the order of 5 hours for the two wings on a single aircraft, thereby reducing inspection times by up to a factor of 10 when compared with radiographic inspection [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%