1960
DOI: 10.1109/jrproc.1960.287599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulse Compression-Key to More Efficient Radar Transmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

1960
1960
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For observation points 4 and 5 , the error has increased to about 8 × 10 −7 because they have moved to the right, closer to the origin. This happens for two reasons: the wavelength is getting smaller and we approach the region where the error value is higher for (9) and (10). Nevertheless, in Table 4, the absolute error at 5 has diminished due to the accuracy of our proposed expressions (see Figures 4 and 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For observation points 4 and 5 , the error has increased to about 8 × 10 −7 because they have moved to the right, closer to the origin. This happens for two reasons: the wavelength is getting smaller and we approach the region where the error value is higher for (9) and (10). Nevertheless, in Table 4, the absolute error at 5 has diminished due to the accuracy of our proposed expressions (see Figures 4 and 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…When < 3.5, absolute error for (10) is higher than that for (12), with a maximum error of 10 −3 (see Figure 7(a)). When > 3.5, the accuracy improves notoriously for (10). For instance, in Figure 7 error at about 10 −3 .…”
Section: Deduction Of Approximationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations