2015
DOI: 10.1186/s40174-014-0029-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Publicizing the results of standardized external tests: does it have an effect on school outcomes?

Abstract: We study the effect of standardized external tests on students' academic outcomes. We exploit the fact that only one of the 17 Spanish regions started doing and publishing the results of standardized tests in 2005 and apply a difference-in-difference methodology using outcomes of the PISA study from 2000 to 2009. We later confirm our results using synthetic control methods. Employing data from a single country allows us to minimize biases arising from differences in legal frameworks, social or cultural environ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anghel et al . () study the effects of conducting and publishing the results of standardized tests in primary schools by exploiting the fact that this policy has only been implemented by one region in Spain (Madrid) since 2005. Therefore, their estimation strategy consists of setting up the treatment group before the treatment (students from Madrid who took the PISA 2000 reading exam and the PISA 2003 mathematics test) and after the treatment (students who took the 2009 PISA reading exam or the 2012 mathematics test), where the control group is composed of students from other Spanish regions where there was no primary school exam before (PISA 2000 or 2003) and after the treatment (PISA 2009 or 2012).…”
Section: Empirical Studies Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anghel et al . () study the effects of conducting and publishing the results of standardized tests in primary schools by exploiting the fact that this policy has only been implemented by one region in Spain (Madrid) since 2005. Therefore, their estimation strategy consists of setting up the treatment group before the treatment (students from Madrid who took the PISA 2000 reading exam and the PISA 2003 mathematics test) and after the treatment (students who took the 2009 PISA reading exam or the 2012 mathematics test), where the control group is composed of students from other Spanish regions where there was no primary school exam before (PISA 2000 or 2003) and after the treatment (PISA 2009 or 2012).…”
Section: Empirical Studies Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding empirical evaluations in Spain, we find some previous works analysing the causal relationship between different specific education programmes or large public policies and educational outcomes. For example, Anghel et al (2015) find that the publication of the results of standardized external test in the region of Madrid had a significant positive effect in reading by the end of secondary education. Likewise, Anghel et al (2016) evaluated the introduction of bilingual education in a group of public primary schools in the region of Madrid concluding that the programme had a strong negative effect on general knowledge subjects taught in English but not in Mathematics and Reading taught in Spanish.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This belowaverage achievement provides an opportunity for testing new interventions because a successful intervention, after sufficient instrument development, may be able to be used in this same setting to enhance students' math outcomes before students fall behind on standardized math achievement on international tests. Second, Madrid is the only region in Spain that makes each school's average results on standardized tests available to the public (Anghel et al, 2015); and there is intense governmental and educational interest in boosting math performance in Spain in general and Madrid in particular. Indeed, we received considerable assistance from local policymakers, principals, and teachers in the conduct of this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%