Publications about Women, Science, and Engineering: Use of Sex and Gender in Titles over a Forty-six-year Period

Abstract

This article focuses on key features of the use of sex and gender in titles of articles about women, science, and engineering over an important forty-six-year period (1965–2010). The focus is theoretically and empirically consequential. Theoretically, the paper addresses science as a critical case that connects femininity/masculinity to social stratification; and the use of sex and gender as an enduring, analytical issue that reveals perspectives on hierarchies of femininity/masculinity. Empirically, this article identifies the emergence, development, and stabilization of published articles about women, science, and engineering that use sex and gender in their titles. The distinctive method involves search, retrieval, and review of 23,430 articles, using intercoder reliabilities for inclusion/exclusion. This results in a uniquely specified and comprehensive set of articles on our subject and the identification of titles with sex and gender. Findings point to (1) the growth of gender titles, (2) their increase in every field, (3) differing concentrations of sex and gender titles in journals, (4) a span of telling topic areas, and (5) higher citation rates of gender, compared to sex, titles. Broader implications appear in reasons for the growth of gender titles, meanings of topic areas that occur, insights into social inequalities and science policies, and emerging complexities of nonbinary categories of sex/gender.

Translating interdisciplinary knowledge for gender equity: Quantifying the impact of NSF ADVANCE

“…As shown in Figure 1B, almost a third of authors come from psychology (326), followed by sociology (175), political science (117), engineering (80), computer science (45) and medicine (42). This predominance of psychology authors and articles is unsurprising, as compared to social science fields broadly, psychology is more likely to have published articles about sex and/or gender (Fox et al 2022).…”

“…This predominance of psychology authors and articles is unsurprising, as compared to social science fields broadly, psychology is more likely to have published articles about sex and/or gender (Fox et al. 2022).…”

The state-of-the-art of research on science research careers

“…Studies from the meta-research approach have raised the issue of gender inequality in science from different perspectives (Broderick and Casadevall, 2019;Ioannidis et al, 2015). In general terms, the scientific interest in the study of social stratification by gender has been increasing since the 1960s (Fox et al, 2021). Gender inequality is a persistent phenomenon in science research careers (Lariviere et al, 2013).…”

Kitchen Chemistry Boosts STEM Identity and Increases STEM Career Interests

“…Whereas gender and sex are still often used interchangeably in everyday parlance, newer social science writings distinguish between the terms, associating sex with biological and gender with socio-cultural aspects. 102 In the context of this article about kitchen chemistry activities, we deemed it appropriate to use the terminology of gender and men/women or boys/girls. Furthermore, it was noteworthy that only 93 participants selected "other".…”