Abstract:consensus, however, on whether these differences lead to greater job satisfaction and if, on average, the public sector employee job satisfaction is higher than that of those in the private sector.The results in the different studies are also conditioned by the cultural, economic and socio-political context of the reference country, so it is expected that the comparison of job satisfaction levels between public and private workers will differ in different regional contexts. Specifically, the Spanish labour mar… Show more
“…Our variable under study-working in the public sectorhas a positive and significant influence on job satisfaction, in line with our initial hypothesis and the works of Steel and Warner (1990), Maidani (1991), DeSantis and Durst (1996), Demoussis and Giannakopoulos (2007), and Sánchez-Sánchez and Fernández (2020). The coefficient is positive even when variables associated with job instability are included, which implies that there are other factors that justify greater satisfaction in the public sector.…”
This study analyses the impact of working in the public sector on job satisfaction in Europe (19) through the European Working Condition Survey (EWCS). A grouping of countries is proposed based on the perception of workers regarding the functioning of the labor market. Econometric estimates show that public sector workers, at an aggregate level, are more satisfied than those in the private sector. The highest job satisfaction corresponds to permanent contract public sector workers, followed by temporary contract public sector employees, the permanent contract private sector, and the temporary contract private sector workers. The results confirm that in those countries with a higher proportion of individuals who consider losing their job a probability, public sector job satisfaction is higher. In addition, those countries where the proportion of individuals with low confidence in finding a new job with similar characteristics to the one they have, public sector job satisfaction is also higher.
“…Our variable under study-working in the public sectorhas a positive and significant influence on job satisfaction, in line with our initial hypothesis and the works of Steel and Warner (1990), Maidani (1991), DeSantis and Durst (1996), Demoussis and Giannakopoulos (2007), and Sánchez-Sánchez and Fernández (2020). The coefficient is positive even when variables associated with job instability are included, which implies that there are other factors that justify greater satisfaction in the public sector.…”
This study analyses the impact of working in the public sector on job satisfaction in Europe (19) through the European Working Condition Survey (EWCS). A grouping of countries is proposed based on the perception of workers regarding the functioning of the labor market. Econometric estimates show that public sector workers, at an aggregate level, are more satisfied than those in the private sector. The highest job satisfaction corresponds to permanent contract public sector workers, followed by temporary contract public sector employees, the permanent contract private sector, and the temporary contract private sector workers. The results confirm that in those countries with a higher proportion of individuals who consider losing their job a probability, public sector job satisfaction is higher. In addition, those countries where the proportion of individuals with low confidence in finding a new job with similar characteristics to the one they have, public sector job satisfaction is also higher.
“…The first outcome of the present study revealed that public employees are more satisfied with their work than their private counterparts. This is the first evidence of this sort obtained from Spain and aligns with previous studies that also confirm greater satisfaction among public employees (Demoussis and Giannakopoulos, 2007;Mihajlov and Mihajlov, 2016b;S anchez-S anchez and Fern andez Puente, 2020;Steel and Warner, 1990;Steijn, 2008; Notes: þ p < 0.1; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 Zeffane and Bani Melhem, 2017). Although generalizability is not recommended as these countries may have different working conditions, Demoussis and Giannakopoulos (2007) used a sample of Greek employees and Zeffane and Bani Melhem (2017) used a sample of public and private employees from the service sector in the United Arab Emirates and provided results that confirmed our findings.…”
Section: Mediating Role Of Job Demandssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…One of the Mediating role of job demands debates in the literature on employee satisfaction in the public sector has to do with the question of whether public employees are more or less satisfied than their private sector counterparts (Bright, 2008). Whereas some studies have found that public employees are more satisfied (Demoussis and Giannakopoulos, 2007;Mihajlov and Mihajlov, 2016b;S anchez-S anchez and Fern andez Puente, 2020;Steel and Warner, 1990;Steijn, 2008;Zeffane and Bani Melhem, 2017), others have found the opposite (Borges, 2013;Burke and Singh, 2016). Therefore, the debate is still open.…”
Purpose
This paper aims to compare job satisfaction in public and private sectors and the mediating role of several job demands and resources on the relationship between the employment sector and job satisfaction.
Design/methodology/approach
Drawing on the job demands-resources model, this study argued that differences in job satisfaction were explained largely by the job characteristics provided in each sector. Data comes from the quality of working life survey, a representative sample of 6,024 Spanish public and private employees.
Findings
This study revealed that public employees were more satisfied than private ones. This relationship was partially mediated by job demands and job resources, meaning that the public and private employment sectors provided different working conditions. Public employees, in general, had fewer demands and more job resources than private ones, which resulted in different levels of job satisfaction. Additionally, partial mediation indicated that public employees are more satisfied than private ones, despite accounting for several job demands and job resources.
Research limitations/implications
While the findings of this study highlighted the relative importance of job demands and job resources in affecting job satisfaction of public and private employees, the generalizability of the results to other countries should be limited as the study only used data from a single country.
Practical implications
A significant portion of the positive effect on job satisfaction of public employees is channeled through the lower levels of routine work and lower number of required working hours and through better job resources such as higher salary, more telework, greater prospects at work and more training utility. To improve job satisfaction, it is apparent that managers should pay special attention to things such as routine work, working hours, training and telework.
Originality/value
This paper contributes to the comprehension of how several job demands and resources simultaneously play a mediating role in explaining the relationship between the employment sector and job satisfaction.
“…Or it might simply be that women pay more attention to different resources than men do. Somewhat surprisingly, the analysis did not uncover any striking differences in efficiency levels between private and public sectors, despite several previous studies explicitly distinguishing and comparing job satisfaction measures between private and public sector domains [46][47][48].…”
This study contributes to the organizational sustainability literature by exploring a methodology for defining and making the notion of employee flourishing at work operational. It applies stochastic frontier methods on British longitudinal data to estimate the maximum job satisfaction that employees can achieve should they utilize their resources efficiently. It offers a new perspective on the notion of social comparisons and extends the literature by demonstrating the scope for organizational intervention in the context of commonly assumed, time invariant variables, which are often thought to be beyond interventionist possibilities. Findings suggest that many British employees fail to reach their job satisfaction potential, reporting satisfaction scores below those of their peers with similar resource endowments. This inefficiency correlates strongly with personality traits. Implications for organizational sustainability policy and practice are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.