The GeoJournal Library
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6053-3_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public space in the “blue cities” of Russia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From a top–down perspective, it has been widely observed that powerful groups in non‐Western societies, much alike to their Western counterparts, work painstakingly to inscribe dominant values and political views into public space. Studies on communist/socialist regimes, for example, suggest that the planning, building and architectural design of grandiose public spaces were/are essential to the showcase of state power (Stanilov, ; Engel, ; Ioan, ; Kurfürst, ). From the erection of colonial and later nationalist symbols in a Taipei park (Allen, ), to the use of public space for assembling the mass and staging political propaganda in Maoist China (Hung, ), and to the initiatives of ‘nationalist urbanism’, which created landscapes of power to represent Jakarta as a unifying force of Indonesian nation (Kusno, ), public space has played an indispensable part in shoring up the political legitimacy of state regimes (also Lavrence, ; Gaubatz, ; Light and Young, ).…”
Section: Spaces Of Appropriationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a top–down perspective, it has been widely observed that powerful groups in non‐Western societies, much alike to their Western counterparts, work painstakingly to inscribe dominant values and political views into public space. Studies on communist/socialist regimes, for example, suggest that the planning, building and architectural design of grandiose public spaces were/are essential to the showcase of state power (Stanilov, ; Engel, ; Ioan, ; Kurfürst, ). From the erection of colonial and later nationalist symbols in a Taipei park (Allen, ), to the use of public space for assembling the mass and staging political propaganda in Maoist China (Hung, ), and to the initiatives of ‘nationalist urbanism’, which created landscapes of power to represent Jakarta as a unifying force of Indonesian nation (Kusno, ), public space has played an indispensable part in shoring up the political legitimacy of state regimes (also Lavrence, ; Gaubatz, ; Light and Young, ).…”
Section: Spaces Of Appropriationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Russia, measures to reduce the role of automobiles were only carried out in megacities such as Moscow and Saint Petersburg, while in most largeand medium-sized cities, personal transport remains the most important means of transportation for the general population (Engel 2007;Ryzkov and Zyuzin 2016;Ksenofontov and Milyakin 2018). This is largely due to the socio-economic and climatic peculiarities of Russia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Huyssen, 1984) Vairums pētnieku savos darbos padomju perioda lielmēroga dzīvojamos rajonus vērtē kritiski. (Niit, Kruusavall, Heidments,1981;Pallot, Shaw, 1981;Lefebvre 1991;Angotti 1993;Engel, 2007;Ušča, 2010;Nunan, 2012) Arī lielmēroga dzīvojamie rajoni ārpus PSRS robežām literatūrā atspoguļoti kā ilustrācija neveiksmīgam plānojumam, īpaši akcentējot rajonu lomu sociālās segregācijas procesos. (Coleman, 1990) Liela daļa literatūras par padomju laika lielmēroga dzīvojamajiem rajoniem ir veltīta to vēsturiskajai izpētei, īpaši uzsverot telpiskās organizācijas attīstības gaitu.…”
Section: Annotation Of the Doctoral Thesisunclassified