Abstract:To enhance the capacity of public institutions in Ethiopia and to create an ideal environment for investment and economic growth, the public sector has gone through a series of reform processes including the civil service. This article attempts to assess the outcomes of the Public Sector Capacity reform, based on a small‐scale survey conducted in two ministries. The survey, which was conducted between March and May in 2005, reveals a notable transformation of service delivery in each organisation. Very high le… Show more
“…Zaltman et al (1971) and Berthon et al (2004) depict innovativeness as 'open-mindedness', 'enterprising', 'willingness to change', 'ability to innovate' or to be creative. This conceptualization underscores the current authors' emphasis on what Mengesha and Common (2006) refer to as a firm's receptivity and "willingness to forgo old habits and try untested ideas" (2006, p. 66). Similarly, (Cotte & Wood, 2004) conceptualize it as the tendency to embrace change and try new things.…”
Business process reengineering (BPR) is a popular management approach, which enables organizations to conduct substantial business and technological improvements. Successful implementation of BPR can assist organizations to change their old-fashioned practices into innovative processes through reorganizing and eliminating some processes and/or finding innovative ways to conduct business activities. Studies have shown, successful BPR implementation can. 1) create higher customer satisfaction, 2) increase productivity, 3) build higher flexibility in business processes, 4) improve organizational integrity which shall lead to sustainable competitive advantage for the firm. However, findings by different researches illustrate that up to 70% of BPR's failures are at implementation stage due to lack of understanding of involved factors by different levels of management in an organization. This paper has exclusively developed the model, which can address the role of different factors in the implementation of Business Process Reengineering (BPR) performance and the ultimate outcome as competitive advantage. In addition, this research studies the influence of company size and business type as a moderator in the relationship between independent variables of study and BPR performance. The proposed model here aims to help planners in identifying a set of critical processes that are aligned with the firm's strategic performance and then become candidate processes for further implementation.
“…Zaltman et al (1971) and Berthon et al (2004) depict innovativeness as 'open-mindedness', 'enterprising', 'willingness to change', 'ability to innovate' or to be creative. This conceptualization underscores the current authors' emphasis on what Mengesha and Common (2006) refer to as a firm's receptivity and "willingness to forgo old habits and try untested ideas" (2006, p. 66). Similarly, (Cotte & Wood, 2004) conceptualize it as the tendency to embrace change and try new things.…”
Business process reengineering (BPR) is a popular management approach, which enables organizations to conduct substantial business and technological improvements. Successful implementation of BPR can assist organizations to change their old-fashioned practices into innovative processes through reorganizing and eliminating some processes and/or finding innovative ways to conduct business activities. Studies have shown, successful BPR implementation can. 1) create higher customer satisfaction, 2) increase productivity, 3) build higher flexibility in business processes, 4) improve organizational integrity which shall lead to sustainable competitive advantage for the firm. However, findings by different researches illustrate that up to 70% of BPR's failures are at implementation stage due to lack of understanding of involved factors by different levels of management in an organization. This paper has exclusively developed the model, which can address the role of different factors in the implementation of Business Process Reengineering (BPR) performance and the ultimate outcome as competitive advantage. In addition, this research studies the influence of company size and business type as a moderator in the relationship between independent variables of study and BPR performance. The proposed model here aims to help planners in identifying a set of critical processes that are aligned with the firm's strategic performance and then become candidate processes for further implementation.
“…Thus, organizationwide transformational programs targeting processes, structure, technology, and people (Hammer & Champy, 1995; Heeks, 2002) have come and gone under different names over the last 18 years: the civil service reform program initiated in 1993, the performance and service delivery improvement program piloted in 2001, and BPR launched in 2005 (“Business Process Re‐engineering,” 2009). Mengesha and Common (2006, p. 4), for example, indicated: …”
Section: Background Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BPR is still in an experimental phase, and there are only a handful of success stories in some sections of government ministries (“Business Process Re‐engineering,”2009). In order to assess the impact of BPR projects, Mengesha and Common (2006), for example, conducted small‐scale surveys in two government ministries and proceeded to discover promising achievements in both performance and user satisfaction by implementing major improvements in the service delivery system.…”
Despite the increasing attention paid to the human element of project success found in the project management literature, empirical studies exploring cultural patterns influencing this particular human element continue to be far from satisfactory. To help further understand the influence of cultural patterns within Sub‐Saharan Africa project environments, we draw on a case study conducted in Ethiopia's service sector. Apart from the well‐perceived cultural values commonly referred to in the existing literature, we specifically investigated the deep‐rooted underlying causes, which include Ethiopian cultural habits, as a principal factor in influencing project team behavior. The article concludes with implications and recommendations for future research.
“…In their research they inform that an efficient, productive and accountable civil service remains premised on competitive compensation and performance-based promotion. Mengesha and Common (2007) assess the outcomes of the Public Sector Capacity reform, based on a small-scale survey conducted in two ministries. The results of the survey informs that there was notable transformation in the quality of service delivery in the ministries.…”
Section: The Developing Country Experience Of Reformmentioning
Extant literature informs that the modern state requires a
civil service whose performance is accurately measured, evaluated and
subsequently rewarded (or punished). In this paper we use Pakistan as a
case study of a country in which the performance evaluation system is
obsolete and resistant to change. After analysing literature on the
importance of performance management systems in bureaucracies, we
evaluate the present structure of the Pakistani performance evaluation
system of civil servants and identify its major weaknesses. We then
present the results of a unique survey of senior civil servants which
informs on how they viewed potential reforms of the current system.
Based on this, we present a revised instrument to more accurately
measure the performance of Pakistani civil servants, which both adapts
the existing instrument while being cognizant of the international best
practices. Finally we look at some of the significant political economy
factors that could hinder the introduction of a new performance
management system. Keywords: Performance Evaluation, Political
Manipulation, SMART, Political Alignment Performance Management, Civil
Service
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.