Public-private technology R&D partnerships: lessons from US partnership for a new generation of vehicles

Abstract

Government-industry R&D partnerships can play an important role in advancing the public interest. A widely cited example is the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles (PNGV). It was launched in 1993 by the Clinton Administration and three US automakers, with the goal of advancing the development of energy ef®cient vehicles. It has come to be seen as a model, and in many ways it is: it is proceeding according to schedule; it increased the pro®le of advanced technology opportunities; and it led to better working relationships between the federal government and automakers. It also indirectly led to technology advancementÐby inspiring more aggressive investments by European and Japanese automakers that, in turn, through a boomerang effect, inspired US automakers to do likewise. It is a success in the sense that both sets of partners are pleased. But has it served the public interest? Has it led to the best investment of government R&D funds and has it accelerated the commercialization of socially bene®cial technologies? The answers to these latter questions are still uncertain. q

The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: Revisiting the contingent effectiveness model

“…Thus, if a new drill bit project enables deeper drilling, opening up North Sea oil exploration (Link, 1995), how much does one credit the project versus prior science? If a firm that has been working for years on automobile battery technology and finally, with the help of a federal laboratory CRADA-based partnership, works with a university consortium to produce a better battery and then brings it to market, how does one sort out the various contributions (Sperling, 2001;Sperling and Gordon, 2008) A number of studies employ the Market Impact model in assessing technology transfer effectiveness. However, the studies are not recent ones.…”

Renewable energy RD&D expenditure and CO2emissions in 15 European countries

“…In a deregulated energy sector, government RD&D funding is increasingly being allocated for public-private partnerships. For example, In a study of publicprivate partnerships for RD&D in new generation low-energy vehicle development, Sperling (2001) has questioned the efficacy of the instruments and scope in the policy to accelerate the commercialization of socially beneficial technologies. Discussions on the impact of underinvestment can be found in Dooley (1998), Elliott (1994) and Kobos et al (2006).…”

Exploring car manufacturers’ responses to technology-forcing regulation: The case of California's ZEV mandate

“…1) and as various interviewees indicated, commercialization was limited to Chrysler's NEV-oriented short-term compliance strategy of selling thousands of NEVs produced in collaboration with NEV manufacturer GEM. For compliance Chrysler also relied on its partner Daimler's HFCV credits (Sperling, 2001). While complying, Chrysler was opposing and trying to relax the ZEV mandate through lobbying, see Table 4, and litigation (CARB, 2004).…”