Public Private Partnerships in Europe for Building and Managing Public Infrastructures: An Economic Perspective

Iossa, Elisabetta; Saussier, Stéphane

doi:10.1111/apce.12192

Cited by 49 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is worth noticing that Chou et al [42] acknowledges existing negative effects of such collaboration, as disputes may occur during contract management. However, a research from Cheung et al [43] highlights the PPP benefits on mitigating the shortage of governmental funding and avoid public investment restriction in the UK Most EU member states and also considers the PPPs as an important tool to attract additional financial resources [44] and, overall, the years to come we will find an increasing role for PPPs in the provision of public infrastructures and services [45]. We have also noticed a lack of research in recent years concerning the governmental process digitalization, when compared with the AI that has gained strength.…”

Section: The Digital Scope and The Shift To Artificial Intelligencementioning

confidence: 99%

Artificial Intelligence in Government Services: A Systematic Literature Review

Reis

Santo

Melão

2019

Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this paper is to provide an overview on how artificial intelligence is shaping the digital era, in policy making and governmental terms. In doing so, it discloses new opportunities and discusses its implications to be considered by policy-makers. The research uses a systematic literature review, which includes more than one technique of data analysis in order to generate comprehensiveness and rich knowledge, we use: a bibliometric analysis and a content analysis. While artificial intelligence is identified as an extension of digital transformation, the results suggest the need to deepen scientific research in the fields of public administration, governmental law and business economics, areas where digital transformation still stands out from artificial intelligence. Although bringing together public and private sectors, to collaborate in the public service delivery, presents major advantages to policy makers, evidence has also shown the existence of negative effects of such collaboration. Keywords: Digital transformation Á Digital era Á Artificial intelligence Á Political science Á Policy-makers Á Government services Á Systematic literature review Á Technological development

show abstract

Section: The Digital Scope and The Shift To Artificial Intelligencementioning

confidence: 99%

Artificial Intelligence in Government Services: A Systematic Literature Review

Reis

Santo

Melão

2019

Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This scheme is also adopted in railway projects worldwide to release state budgets through a cost-sharing scenario from the private sector. Some countries, such as in the western part of Europe and Japan, heavily depend on a market based on private investment [28,29]. While in some others, mainly from developing countries such as Indonesia, the railway is part of public interest, thus should be managed by the government or representation of the state [30,31].…”

Section: Public-private Partnership In Railway Projectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring Public–Private Partnership Scheme in Operation and Maintenance Stage of Railway Project

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Public–private partnership (PPP) has been extensively used in many sectors worldwide to provide alternative funding for public infrastructure. However, limited evidence found that this scheme was successfully adopted in railway transport particularly in the later stage of the project life cycle. Private participation during operation and maintenance stages are worthy of comprehensive research to cope with recovery of public investment and institutionalization problems. This research aims to analyze the potential of unbundling scenarios based on railway components by taking into account the Light Rail Transit (LRT) project in developing countries as the case study. A life cycle cost evaluation and sensitivity analysis were used to formulate a practical and regulatory framework for the macro-level of decision-making modeling. The findings indicate a possible scenario by considering the passenger demand, ticket price, and government support to generate the best option based on net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR). The proposed alternative recommends an attractive investment return for private interest, encourages lower support for government subsidy, and offers a reasonable tariff for the users. The study also suggests future implications from the adoption of research findings which may affect policy formulation and railway industry as a whole.

show abstract

“…The benefits of negotiation during the selection stage are also emphasized by (Decio Coviello, Andrea Guglielmo and Giancarlo Spagnolo, 2017). With a regression discontinuity design analysis to document the causal effect of increasing buyers' discretion on procurement outcomes in a large database for public 8 This section relies on Iossa and Saussier (2018). works in Italy, they found that discretion increases the probability that the same firm wins repeatedly, but it does not deteriorate the procurement outcomes.…”

Section: Box 5: Privatization and Mortalitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Public Versus Private Management in Water Public Services: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead

Porchet

Saussier²

2018

SSRN Journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Governments have largely turned to public-private partnerships (PPPs) to manage public services. Although it is difficult to analyze PPPs as discrete and alternative forms of public service organization, they all constitute some forms of partial outsourcing of activities that contribute to the realization of a public service. In water industries, the most common form of PPPs is the concession, in which a private firm finances and operates the public service of water while the infrastructure remains public. This report seeks to answer the question of whether PPPs have contributed successfully to the quality and improvement of water public services all around the world. The paper is organized in three sections. In the first section, the different supposed advantages and costs of PPPs are presented. The second section reviews some of the most important studies on the efficiency of PPPs in water industries. The last section provides some recommendations to improve the use of PPPs in water public services.

show abstract

Public Private Partnerships in Europe for Building and Managing Public Infrastructures: An Economic Perspective

Cited by 49 publications

References 54 publications

Artificial Intelligence in Government Services: A Systematic Literature Review

Artificial Intelligence in Government Services: A Systematic Literature Review

Exploring Public–Private Partnership Scheme in Operation and Maintenance Stage of Railway Project

Public Versus Private Management in Water Public Services: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About