The Chilean governance model of resource extraction challenges the view that post-neoliberalism is an opposing development model rejecting the Washington Consensus, which is constitutive of neoliberal governance. Instead, post-neoliberalism is continuity with change, where marketised governance in mining is maintained by the Chilean state yet certain policy agendas are introduced in response to the failures of staunchly private sector-driven development. Neostructuralism follows the logic of productivism, which emphasise the depoliticisation of copper management and the political exclusion of voices critical of the model. However, it breaks away from the typical mode of neoliberalism because there exist political spaces for contestation of copper policy, particularly through the re-regulation of labour practices and the passage of royalty law to address Chile's vulnerabilities to external factors affecting copper production. The article contributes to the understanding of continuities and changes in post-neoliberal Latin America by unpacking the elements of natural resource governance in one of the most widely cited successful cases of a mining-based development model in the developing world.The euphoric arguments of a post-neoliberal governance regime characterising the new left in Latin America are now widely explored. 1 That these are two opposing governance models marked by a break away from neoliberalism is challenged by the Chilean case, in which the state plays a steering role to promote private sector-led development and public-firm efficiency in the mining sector. Its main feature is a policy of continuity between Pinochet's neoliberal reforms and La Concertacio´n's neostructuralist policies , where the logic of productivism serves as the foundation of copper policy. In the midst of the move towards state-controlled resource governance characterising post-neoliberalism in Latin America, Chile's Jewellord T Nem Singh is a PhD candidate in the