1991
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-3326-5_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Ownership Versus Privatisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, Robinson (1992a) argues that "the main argument for privatisation is that it provides the quickest and most effective means of liberalisation in many markets." See also George (1991). Bijs (1993) is less optimistic: "A priori it is not clear why the state, failing to run the firms as owner, should now suddenly have become an efficient regulator.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Robinson (1992a) argues that "the main argument for privatisation is that it provides the quickest and most effective means of liberalisation in many markets." See also George (1991). Bijs (1993) is less optimistic: "A priori it is not clear why the state, failing to run the firms as owner, should now suddenly have become an efficient regulator.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%