2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public opinion on renewable energy technologies in Portugal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
56
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Focussing on wind power, Bell et al [10] and Musall & Kuik [9] present similar findings for the UK and southeast Germany respectively. Interestingly, Ribeiro et al [21] report for Portugal that, with the exception of biomass, they could not find major differences between RES acceptance on an abstract vs. a local level. The lack of local acceptance is often explained by the NIMBY ('not in my backyard') phenomenon following the idea that people have a positive attitude towards something (e.g., RES expansion) until they are personally confronted with the consequences (e.g., a RES or grid project in their neighbourhood) and that they then behave oppositional for selfish reasons.…”
Section: Discussion Comparison To Related Work Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Focussing on wind power, Bell et al [10] and Musall & Kuik [9] present similar findings for the UK and southeast Germany respectively. Interestingly, Ribeiro et al [21] report for Portugal that, with the exception of biomass, they could not find major differences between RES acceptance on an abstract vs. a local level. The lack of local acceptance is often explained by the NIMBY ('not in my backyard') phenomenon following the idea that people have a positive attitude towards something (e.g., RES expansion) until they are personally confronted with the consequences (e.g., a RES or grid project in their neighbourhood) and that they then behave oppositional for selfish reasons.…”
Section: Discussion Comparison To Related Work Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further details are provided in section 2.1. Moreover, the acceptance of RES as a whole has been analysed in literature [7,21]. Focussing on individual technologies, Van der Horst [4], Guo et al [6], Bell et al [10] and Wolsink [22] studied the acceptance of wind energy whereas Battaglini et al [11], Devine-Wright [13], Ciupuliga & Cuppen [14] and Cotton & Devine-Wright [23] study the acceptance of grid infrastructure.…”
Section: Please Cite As: Bertsch V Hall M Weinhardt C and Fichmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A menor implantação da energia solar parece jogar a favor da sua aceitação, uma vez que alguns estudos têm revelado um efeito de saturação da implantação de energia eólica na perceção das populações (Kaldellis, 2005). Isto reflete-se, na literatura sobre implantação de energia solar, numa escassez relativa de controvérsias e num elevado nível de aceitação face a outras formas de energia renovável (Carlisle et al, 2014;Kaldellis et al, 2013;Ribeiro et al, 2014). As referências à emergência de controvérsias tendem também a desenvolver-se em torno de prioridades diferentes.…”
Section: Enquadramentounclassified
“…As such they can significantly contribute to the local residents' welfare in Portugal. Remarkably, Ribeiro et al [44] state that public opinion is less familiar with biomass and as such it is less supported. heating production in group 2, all in % of GFEC [52,54].…”
Section: Presents Intermediate Countries (Group 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Portugal Gouveia et al [43] state that the importance of RES in the Portuguese electricity generation sector has grown strongly, mainly due to a considerable increase in the share of onshore wind. According to Ribeiro et al [44], technologies for solar power plants and hydro power are regarded as the most desirable for further development in near future, provided that they are applied on a local scale. As such they can significantly contribute to the local residents' welfare in Portugal.…”
Section: Presents Intermediate Countries (Group 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%