2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7391-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public health effects of gambling – debate on a conceptual model

Abstract: Background Gambling for money is a popular leisure time activity in most countries, which has major social and economic impacts not only affecting the gambler, but his/her significant others, and the society. Gambling impact studies can help researchers and policymakers compare the health and social costs and benefits of different gambling policies and can be used when considering which gambling policies will reduce or increase costs or benefits the most. In a public health approach, the impacts o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 155 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed that survey participants having or having had an addiction were more likely to both play gambling before lockdown and worsen gambling activity during the lockdown. In line with current available literature, being a smoker (Latvala et al, 2019;Pacifici et al, 2019), or a cannabis user (Pacifici et al, 2019;Xian, Giddens, Scherrer, Eisen, & Potenza, 2014), or being affected by alcohol use disorder (Pacifici et al, 2019;Potenza et al, 2019), were all associated with being a gambler before lockdown. We also observed that electronic cigarette and HTP use were associated with being a gambler before lockdown.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We observed that survey participants having or having had an addiction were more likely to both play gambling before lockdown and worsen gambling activity during the lockdown. In line with current available literature, being a smoker (Latvala et al, 2019;Pacifici et al, 2019), or a cannabis user (Pacifici et al, 2019;Xian, Giddens, Scherrer, Eisen, & Potenza, 2014), or being affected by alcohol use disorder (Pacifici et al, 2019;Potenza et al, 2019), were all associated with being a gambler before lockdown. We also observed that electronic cigarette and HTP use were associated with being a gambler before lockdown.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Despite gambling is widely recognized as a popular leisure activity, it can affect well-being, social interactions and financial status of selected individuals. Gambling might therefore represent a potential public health concerning activity (Latvala, Lintonen, & Konu, 2019). Lifetime prevalence of combined problem gambling and pathological gambling has been estimated to range from 0.7 to 6.5% worldwide (Calado & Griffiths, 2016) and from 0.5 to 3.8% in Italy (Cavalera et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although other frameworks have been advanced during this decade (e.g., see Finnish researchers Latvala et al’s ( 2019 ) Public Health Impacts of Gambling Model), they have not yet been as influential in shaping research and policy as those described above. With the expansion of new evidence-informed frameworks and models, the next logical step is to operationalize public health approaches to gambling harm, taking into consideration the inherent challenges and existing public health structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commercial gambling is a large industry with many multinational and national companies (Hodgins and Petry 2016). Although gambling is a recreational activity for most individuals, a significant proportion develop gambling-related problems and problematic gambling is considered a public health issue in many countries (Latvala et al 2019;Wardle et al 2019). Gambling disorder is characterized by loss of control and negative consequences (American Psychiatric Association 2013), and the prevalence for gambling disorder and its subclinical form is around 2-4% in most jurisdictions (Williams et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%