2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public awareness and perceptions of carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS): Insights from surveys administered to representative samples in six European countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have not sought to regress against R&D indicators, though -as with many of the findings, this merits further investigation. We can more confidently say that support and opposition is associated with specific characteristics that span countries (gender, education, urban and affluence, prior attitudes towards energy issues and towards specific alternative energy technologies (Pietzner et al 2011)), though again further work would be needed to characterise any further associations.…”
Section: Principal Findings and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have not sought to regress against R&D indicators, though -as with many of the findings, this merits further investigation. We can more confidently say that support and opposition is associated with specific characteristics that span countries (gender, education, urban and affluence, prior attitudes towards energy issues and towards specific alternative energy technologies (Pietzner et al 2011)), though again further work would be needed to characterise any further associations.…”
Section: Principal Findings and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the reactions of local publics to storage projects have been under great scrutiny [11,12]. Not-in-my-backyard (NIMBY), or more accurately, not-under-my-backyard, effects have been differentiated from general reactions by measuring the reactions of offsite and onsite publics [13].…”
Section: Ccs In Societymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pro-active risk communication and early involvement of stakeholders will also help to address concerns about procedural fairness (Bradbury et al, 2009). We discovered that another reason for communicating now is that, while CCS remains relatively unfamiliar in most countries (Pietzner et al, 2011), people will likely be open to receiving information and approach it with an open mind. That may change after people form their first impressions about CCS, perhaps based on limited facts.…”
Section: The Time To Communicate About Ccs Is Nowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, first impressions about CCS can linger and solidify, even if they are initially feeble and easy to influence (de Best-Waldhober, Daamen, & Faaij, 2009;Pietzner et al, 2011).…”
Section: The Time To Communicate About Ccs Is Nowmentioning
confidence: 99%