Public Attitudes Toward Immigration in the United States and Canada in Response to the September 11, 2001 “Attack on America”

Abstract

In this paper, we describe recent trends in attitudes toward immigration in North America, and we suggest how these attitudes are likely to be affected by the September 11, 2001 "Attack on America." We begin by explaining why public attitudes toward immigration are important, and describe recent trends in these attitudes in the United States and Canada. Then, we apply psychological perspectives to predicting how these attitudes are likely to change in response to the events of September 11th. In particular, we describe expected short-term changes in immigration attitudes and expected long-term trends. We conclude by suggesting that an understanding of the psychological processes underlying unfavorable attitudes may assist in counteracting these effects; we also suggest that policy makers will be faced with the difficult task of balancing the need for a sense of security for members of the national group, and maintenance of the positive features of current immigration policies.Public attitudes toward immigration in the United States and Canada have become increasingly favorable in recent years, to some extent due to the relative

Why do citizens want to keep refugees out? Threats, fairness and hostile norms in the treatment of asylum seekers

“…Higher social dominance orientation has also been associated with negative attitudes to immigrants and immigration (Ho, 1987;Levin, Federico, Sidanius, & Rabinowitz, 2002;Pratto & Lemieux, 2001), and with resistance to changes in competitive intergroup relations between host country citizens and immigrants (Esses, Dovidio, Jackson, & Armstrong, 2001). Since refugees are a low power group, and a group like immigrants that may be perceived as competing for a scarce, zero-sum pool of resources (Esses et al, 2001a;Esses et al, 2001b;Esses, Jackson, & Armstrong, 1998), social dominance orientation may be expected to predict unfavourable attitudes to refugees and willingness to restrict refugee access to the host country and its resources.…”

“…This was true even before the September 11th terrorist attack on the United States, and has apparently been consolidated by that event (e.g. Esses, Dovidio, & Hodson, 2001a). The social psychological processes that underlie this widespread support for the restrictive treatment of refugee claimants are thus of great social as well as theoretical interest.…”

The Dominance of Associative Theorizing in Implicit Attitude Research: Propositional and Behavioral Alternatives

“…According to this definition, an evaluation imputes an association between the attitude object and positive or negative valence that determines whether the individual responds in a favorable or unfavorable manner. Attitudes can be formed toward a diverse range of stimuli, from the self (e.g., Koole, Dijksterhuis, & Van Knippenberg, 2001;Pelham, Mirenberg, & Jones, 2002) to other individuals (McConnell, Rydell, Strain, & Mackie, 2008), social groups (e.g., Dovidio, Kawakami, & gaertner, 2002), behaviors (Sherman, Rose, Koch, Presson, & Chassin, 2003), abstract psychological concepts (e.g., nationality; Devos & Banaji, 2005), and events (Esses, Dovidio, & Hodson, 2002). 1 …”

The Effects of Religion on the Immigration Process in the USA: An Experiment

“…Second, public also affect the immigrants' daily life and their success. It creates discrimination and prejudices in the society (Esses, Dovidio, & Hodson, 2002).…”