2011
DOI: 10.1007/bf03395772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dominance of Associative Theorizing in Implicit Attitude Research: Propositional and Behavioral Alternatives

Abstract: In the present article we re-examine one of the most deeply entrenched assumptions in modern attitude research, namely, that A Brief history of AttitudesThe study of attitudes and their essential architecture-although more than 80 years old-continues to command considerable attention within social psychology (see Albarracin, Johnson, & Zanna, 2005;

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
127
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
7
127
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…By relational responses we mean the action of responding to one stimulus in terms of another (e.g., "Unhealthy food is better than Healthy Food"). It has been argued that such responses may be mediated by propositions at the cognitive level of analysis (see Hughes, Barnes-Holmes, & De Houwer, 2011). The important point here, however, is that the intellectual inspiration and theoretical context for the current research was RFT, and more specifically the idea that the automatic responses targeted by the IRAP involve brief and immediate relational responding to the various stimuli presented within the procedure itself.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By relational responses we mean the action of responding to one stimulus in terms of another (e.g., "Unhealthy food is better than Healthy Food"). It has been argued that such responses may be mediated by propositions at the cognitive level of analysis (see Hughes, Barnes-Holmes, & De Houwer, 2011). The important point here, however, is that the intellectual inspiration and theoretical context for the current research was RFT, and more specifically the idea that the automatic responses targeted by the IRAP involve brief and immediate relational responding to the various stimuli presented within the procedure itself.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…controlled) (see Gawronski, Brannon, & Bodenhausen, in press;Hughes et al, 2011). Yet growing evidence suggests that humans can automatically relate stimuli in a wide number of ways and that the manner in which stimuli are related often leads to divergent outcomes on implicit and explicit measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the negative implicit attitude toward smoking as measured by the IAT (a) was more pronounced in the patient group than in the control group and (b) even tended to become more negative from the first to the second test session. While the interpretation of the latter finding is complicated by the fact that a proper control condition is missing, these observations seem to suggest that the IAT was either influenced by automatically activated extrapersonal associations (i.e., knowledge about the fact that smoking is generally viewed as negative in Western societies; see Karpinski and Hilton 2001) or by automatically activated (but personally endorsed) propositional knowledge about the negative consequences of smoking (see Hughes et al 2011). Interestingly, this interpretation would coincide with findings obtained by Chassin et al (2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principle underlying the IAT is that it compares the relative strength of association of the concept of exercise with positive attributes (e. g., good, like, pleasurable) and negative attributes (e. g., bad, disliked, unpleasant). Despite methodological criticism of the IAT (e. g., Hughes, Barnes-Holmes, & De Houwer, 2011) and perhaps due to the relative robustness of its measurements and ease of administration, the IAT is regarded as the method of choice for assessing automatic evaluations (Nosek, Greenwald, & Banaji, 2007), especially in the domain of applied social cognition research. In our context, using the IAT brings the advantage that measurements adequately reflect the automaticity of the valuative process.…”
Section: Preliminary Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%