The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.1999.tb00105.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public and Private Sector Accounting ‐ The Non‐identical Twins

Abstract: A debate in this journal, spanning severa1 years, over the accounting treatment of public assets has concentrated attention on the appropriateness of the Public Sector Accounting Standards Board's decision to apply private sector accounting concepts to the development of public sector accounting standards. The Case is examined here and it is shown why private sector accounting standards must be appropriately adapted to suit a very different and varied operating environment in the public sector. These differenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
89
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(13 reference statements)
4
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Governmental organizations such as local and central government entities use common and public resources to provide public goods and services to citizen users (Puddu, 2001). The existence of externalities and market failure form the basis for government provision of goods and services (Barton, 1999). The move to accounting on an accrual basis in the public sector began in the late 1980s and early 1990s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Governmental organizations such as local and central government entities use common and public resources to provide public goods and services to citizen users (Puddu, 2001). The existence of externalities and market failure form the basis for government provision of goods and services (Barton, 1999). The move to accounting on an accrual basis in the public sector began in the late 1980s and early 1990s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Market-focused principles of management reoriented the primary function of public sector organisations towards the achievement of defined service outputs, economic outcomes and commercial practices, rather than traditional social goals. (Kelsey, 1995;Easton, 1997;Barton, 1999aBarton, , 2000Boston, et al, 1996;Broadbent & Guthrie, 1992;Carnegie & Wolnizer, 1999). Among the range of major shifts in focus imposed on NFP PBEs, tertiary educational institutions were reoriented as service providers of private education benefits to fee-paying students, required to be responsive to market demand and to generate an alternative income to supplement their reduced government funding (Kelsey, 1995, p4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also supporters of this approach that argue that accrual accounting is able to provide information about the financial performance or position, in terms of public resources, that cash-based accounting is not able to (Rowles, 2004) or a more accurate picture of the cost of services (Guthrie, 1998). Smullen (2009) identified three positions of opinion about this issue, when the first group consists of supporters (Das 2008;Micallef and Pierson 1997;Mellor 1996) and the two other groups are represented by opponents (Barton 1999;Newberry 2001;Monsen 2002) -while one criticizes its usefulness and applicability to the public sector, the other rejects the way of its application in the public sector. While supporters argue that accrual accounting is important to create a complete picture of certain governmental financial positions, due to the ability for total and unit cost calculation and consolidation (Das 2008;Smullen 2009), opponents argue, for example, that the inappropriateness of this type of accounting is due to the inapplicability of many financial relationships to the public sector conditions and the different nature of the goods produced in the public sector (Stiglitz 1988;Barton 1999;Smullen 2009).…”
Section: State Of Art -From Cash To Accrual Accounting System?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smullen (2009) identified three positions of opinion about this issue, when the first group consists of supporters (Das 2008;Micallef and Pierson 1997;Mellor 1996) and the two other groups are represented by opponents (Barton 1999;Newberry 2001;Monsen 2002) -while one criticizes its usefulness and applicability to the public sector, the other rejects the way of its application in the public sector. While supporters argue that accrual accounting is important to create a complete picture of certain governmental financial positions, due to the ability for total and unit cost calculation and consolidation (Das 2008;Smullen 2009), opponents argue, for example, that the inappropriateness of this type of accounting is due to the inapplicability of many financial relationships to the public sector conditions and the different nature of the goods produced in the public sector (Stiglitz 1988;Barton 1999;Smullen 2009). Certain opinions argue that the inapplicability of accrual accounting is due to the limited and restricted use of assets and liabilities, but there is a certain difference in the levels and forms of government as local governments are in full possession and because of the autonomy of their assets, and they are able and also responsible to manage them according to Act No.…”
Section: State Of Art -From Cash To Accrual Accounting System?mentioning
confidence: 99%