Accounting for Heritage, Cultural and Community Assets – Alternative Metrics from a New Zealand Māori Educational Institution

Abstract

In the 1980s, with the rise to dominance of governments with neoliberal economic and social agendas, the public sector in major western countries underwent a process of fundamental reforms. A key aspect of the change imposed was the implementation of a market-oriented, cost-efficiency focus towards the management of public sector organisations, described collectively as the New Public Management (NPM) model (Kelsey, 1995;Boston et al, 1996; Easton 1996;Barton, 2002Barton, , 2005aBarton, , 2005bCarnegie & West, 2005;Ball & Grubnic, 2008;Davis, 2010). This reform process included the imposition of regulatory measures requiring public sector organisations to provide annual financial reports prepared on an accounting basis comparable to those for the private sector, and incorporated an obligation to disclose (at economic values) all assets held. For public benefit entities holding heritage, cultural and community assets (HCA), this reporting requirement has been particularly problematic, entailing substantive changes to public accounting policy. This paper critiques the political ideologies and practices of the NPM model, and challenges its assumptions that private sector financial reporting requirements, based on international accounting standards and Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (GAAP), are appropriate for universal application to public benefit and other not-for-profit entities holding HCA. In particular, the paper argues against the NPM assumption that reporting all HCA in economic terms improves accountability in public benefit entities. Instead, the paper proposes an alternative reporting model based on a set of cultural rather than economic values for reporting HCA. It suggests as an exemplar the 'Wellbeing of Communities' reporting and accountability framework devised for application by an indigenous New Zealand Māori educational institution, Te Wānanga-o-Raukawa. AbstractIn the 1980s, with the rise to dominance of governments with neoliberal economic and social agendas, the public sector in major western countries underwent a process of fundamental reforms. A key aspect of the change imposed was the implementation of a market-oriented, cost-efficiency focus towards the management of public sector organisations, described collectively as the New Public Management (NPM) model

Determinants of Related Party Transactions in Jordan: Financial and Governance Factors

“…In an Asian ethnic cultural context, this organisational propensity serves as a powerful deterrent to exerting individual action against a superior and is grounded in a philosophical ideology that has permeated into both economic and government attitudes toward whistleblowers (Graham & Milind 2017;Wild 2013). Confucian societies, although regionally diverse, share a collectivistic culture that emphasizes shared views, norms and a focus on maintaining social relationships, and tend to view individual actions that undermine collective cohesion as existential threats to the community (Keenan 2007).…”

Critical success factors in managing sustainable indigenous businesses in Australia

“…Numerous productivity investigations worldwide have directly linked the absence of an economic basis in the First Nation communities to low performance on health and well-being indicators (Wild, 2011). However, Bourke (1998) argued that the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have always had an economic basis that differs somewhat from the Western neoliberal economic principles.…”

Accounting for heritage assets: Does measuring economic value ‘kill the cat’?

“…Others advocate alternative approaches to the enhancement of accountability which are more grounded in the underlying objectives of the entity. For example, Wild (2013) suggests an alternative approach based on models that have been adopted for cultures in which the profit motive and the enhancement of personal wealth are not key societal values: 'it is essential to develop and engage multiple, relevant measurement indicators' (Wild, 2013, p.13). Even in commercial accounting there are moves to consider wider values: the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) has issued an integrated reporting framework (IIRC, 2013) that embraces financial, manufactured, social and relationship, intellectual, human and natural capital.…”