Public and private providers' involvement in improving their patients' contraceptive use

Landry, David; Wei, Junhow; Frost, Jennifer J.

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2008.03.009

Cited by 62 publications

(58 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Consideration should also be given to compensating clinicians for time spent providing contraceptive counseling, as many PCPs' ability to provide contraceptive counseling is limited by time 21 . In a previous study, 46% of private providers and at least 21% of public providers reported that providing insurance reimbursement for time spent counseling would be a very important way to increase their provision of contraceptive counseling 22 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of Contraceptive Counseling in Primary Care on Contraceptive Use

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of Contraceptive Counseling in Primary Care on Contraceptive Use

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Sixteen articles were identified providing information related to client or provider perspectives regarding what constitutes quality family planning services and were included in this review. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Of the 16 articles, six articles [22][23][24][25][26][27] were included in the previous review conducted by Becker et al 9 (two additional studies 28,29 included in Becker and colleagues 9 were not able to be retrieved and thus are not reported here) and ten [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] were new. Table 3 presents a brief description of the main characteristics of the included studies, including the study design, study population, and data collection methods.…”

Section: Evidence Synthesismentioning

confidence: 98%

Client and Provider Perspectives on Quality of Care

Williams¹,

Gavin²,

Carter³

et al. 2015

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…23 There is also evidence that women who rely on publicly funded clinics, a population that is disproportionally made up of minorities, may actually receive more comprehensive services and be offered more contraceptive options than those who rely on private doctors. 24,25 As access to comprehensive contraceptive services appears to be equal for minorities, we must consider other factors that might contribute toward racial disparities in unintended pregnancy. Attempting to understand disparities in unintended pregnancy requires consideration of a wide array of complex social and cultural issues, including sexuality, reproductive autonomy and power, gender relationships, attitudes towards pregnancy and contraception, and historical relationships with family planning programs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Unintended Pregnancy Influences Racial Disparity in Tubal Sterilization Rates

Borrero

Moore

et al. 2009

J GEN INTERN MED

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND: Minority women are more likely than white women to choose tubal sterilization as a contraceptive method. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy may help explain observed racial/ethnic differences in sterilization, but this association has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE:To examine the associations among race/ ethnicity, unintended pregnancy, and tubal sterilization. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS:Cross-sectional analysis of data from a nationally representative sample of women aged 15-44 years [65.7% white, 14.8% Hispanic, and 13.9% African American (AA)] who participated in the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. MAIN MEASURES:Race/ethnicity, history of unintended pregnancy, and tubal sterilization. A logistic regression model was used to estimate the effect of race/ ethnicity on unintended pregnancy while adjusting for socio-demographic variables. A series of logistic regression models was then used to examine the role of unintended pregnancy as a confounder for the relationship between race/ethnicity and sterilization.KEY RESULTS: Overall, 40% of white, 48% of Hispanic, and 59% of AA women reported a history of unintended pregnancy. After adjusting for socio-demographic variables, AA women were more likely (OR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.6-2.4) and Hispanic women as likely (OR: 1.0; 95% CI: 0.80-1.2) as white women to report unintended pregnancy. Sterilization was reported by 29% of women who had ever had an unintended pregnancy compared to 7% of women who reported never having an unintended pregnancy. In unadjusted analysis, AA and Hispanic women had significantly higher odds of undergoing sterilization (OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.3-1.9 and OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.2-1.7, respectively). After adjusting for unintended pregnancy, this relationship was attenuated and no longer significant (OR: 1.2; 95% CI: 0.95-1.4for AA women and OR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.0-1.6 for Hispanic women).CONCLUSION: Minority women, who more frequently experience unintended pregnancy, may choose tubal sterilization in response to prior experiences with an unintended pregnancy.KEY WORDS: unintended pregnancy; minority women; tubal sterilization.

show abstract

Public and private providers' involvement in improving their patients' contraceptive use

Cited by 62 publications

References 22 publications

The Impact of Contraceptive Counseling in Primary Care on Contraceptive Use

The Impact of Contraceptive Counseling in Primary Care on Contraceptive Use

Client and Provider Perspectives on Quality of Care

Unintended Pregnancy Influences Racial Disparity in Tubal Sterilization Rates

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About