2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-009-1197-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unintended Pregnancy Influences Racial Disparity in Tubal Sterilization Rates

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Minority women are more likely than white women to choose tubal sterilization as a contraceptive method. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy may help explain observed racial/ethnic differences in sterilization, but this association has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE:To examine the associations among race/ ethnicity, unintended pregnancy, and tubal sterilization. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS:Cross-sectional analysis of data from a nationally representative sample of women aged 15-44 years [65.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
27
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to national surveys, Black and Native American women are about twice as likely to have had tubal sterilization as non-Hispanic Whites (Borrero et al 2010; Volscho 2010). As our data is similarly nationally representative, we expect to find similar racial/ethnic differences in sterilization patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to national surveys, Black and Native American women are about twice as likely to have had tubal sterilization as non-Hispanic Whites (Borrero et al 2010; Volscho 2010). As our data is similarly nationally representative, we expect to find similar racial/ethnic differences in sterilization patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Misinformation about sterilization and limited awareness of contraceptive alternatives are common. For example, 62% of African American and 36% of white women thought that sterilization reversal could easily restore fertility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, it did not substantially alter the links between contraceptive sterilization and socioeconomic status. U.S. studies since the mid-twentieth century have almost unanimously reported a strong negative association between socioeconomic status and female contraceptive sterilization but a strong positive association between socioeconomic status and male contraceptive sterilization (Bumpass and Presser 1972; Presser and Bumpass 1972; Shapiro et al 1983; Philliber and Philliber 1985; Chandra 1998; Bumpass et al 2000; Godecker et al 2001; Borrero et al 2009; Chan and Westhoff 2010; Anderson et al 2012; Bertotti 2013). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%