Abstract:When work is performed by workers in protective clothing, sweat evaporation is limited and body temperature rises. In an attempt to quantify the limits such ensembles place on safe work, 6 acclimated men and women walked at 30% VO2max (150-200 W/m2) in 2 protocols involving environmental transients. In one, ambient water vapor pressure (Pw) was fixed at 10 torr, and after rectal temperature (Tre) plateaued, ambient dry-bulb temperature (Tdb) was raised 2 degrees C every 10 min. In the second, Tdb was constant … Show more
“…In heat-acclimated subjects, T es typically equilibrates as a relatively horizontal line before the upward inflection forced by the changing environmental conditions (13)(14)(15). However, in the unacclimated subjects tested here, T es often increased gradually before its upward inflection.…”
Critical environmental limits, defined as those above which heat balance cannot be maintained for a given metabolic heat production, have not been determined for unacclimated subjects. To characterize critical environmental limits and to derive evaporative heat exchange coefficients (K(e)') for unacclimated young men (n = 11) and women (n = 10), subjects of average aerobic fitness walked at 30% maximal aerobic capacity in an environmental chamber. Critical environmental conditions were defined as the psychrometric loci of dry-bulb temperature and water vapor pressure at which core (esophageal) temperature was forced out of equilibrium (heat gain exceeded heat loss). Compared with the men in our study, the women had significantly higher critical environmental limits (P < 0.001) in warm (34-38 degrees C), humid (>60%) environments, a function of their lower absolute metabolic heat production at the fixed relative exercise intensity. Isotherms constructed from biophysical models closely fit the data in this range of environments but underestimated empirically determined critical limits in hotter, drier environments. Sex-specific values of K(e)' were derived by partial calorimetry in the critical water vapor pressure environments, in which full skin wettedness occurred. There were no sex differences for K(e)' (men = 17.4, 15.5, and 14.2 W. m(-2). Torr(-1) and women = 16.8, 15.5, and 14.2 W. m(-2). Torr(-1) at 34, 36, and 38 degrees C, respectively). These K(e)' values were lower than those previously published for fully heat-acclimated men (18.4 W. m(-2). Torr(-1) at 36 degrees C) and women (17.7 W. m(-2). Torr(-1) at 36 degrees C and 15.5 W. m(-2). Torr(-1) at 38 degrees C) and may be used to model heat balance responses for unacclimated men and women working in hot environments.
“…In heat-acclimated subjects, T es typically equilibrates as a relatively horizontal line before the upward inflection forced by the changing environmental conditions (13)(14)(15). However, in the unacclimated subjects tested here, T es often increased gradually before its upward inflection.…”
Critical environmental limits, defined as those above which heat balance cannot be maintained for a given metabolic heat production, have not been determined for unacclimated subjects. To characterize critical environmental limits and to derive evaporative heat exchange coefficients (K(e)') for unacclimated young men (n = 11) and women (n = 10), subjects of average aerobic fitness walked at 30% maximal aerobic capacity in an environmental chamber. Critical environmental conditions were defined as the psychrometric loci of dry-bulb temperature and water vapor pressure at which core (esophageal) temperature was forced out of equilibrium (heat gain exceeded heat loss). Compared with the men in our study, the women had significantly higher critical environmental limits (P < 0.001) in warm (34-38 degrees C), humid (>60%) environments, a function of their lower absolute metabolic heat production at the fixed relative exercise intensity. Isotherms constructed from biophysical models closely fit the data in this range of environments but underestimated empirically determined critical limits in hotter, drier environments. Sex-specific values of K(e)' were derived by partial calorimetry in the critical water vapor pressure environments, in which full skin wettedness occurred. There were no sex differences for K(e)' (men = 17.4, 15.5, and 14.2 W. m(-2). Torr(-1) and women = 16.8, 15.5, and 14.2 W. m(-2). Torr(-1) at 34, 36, and 38 degrees C, respectively). These K(e)' values were lower than those previously published for fully heat-acclimated men (18.4 W. m(-2). Torr(-1) at 36 degrees C) and women (17.7 W. m(-2). Torr(-1) at 36 degrees C and 15.5 W. m(-2). Torr(-1) at 38 degrees C) and may be used to model heat balance responses for unacclimated men and women working in hot environments.
“…Thus the P a 2 min before the upward inflection point was defined as the P crit in the present study. Approximately 10–15 min prior to the T c inflection point, an upward rise in heart rate (Kamon and Avellini 1976; Kamon et al 1978; Kenney and Zeman 2002; Kenney et al 1988) was evident in all tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As opposed to separate tests in each environment, Kamon and Avellini later refined this protocol by defining P crit values at several T db ’s for heat-acclimated women by increasing P a throughout each test (Kamon and Avellini 1976). Subsequent studies determined critical environmental limits for lightly (Kamon et al 1978) and heavier (Kenney et al 1988) clothed heat-acclimated and lightly clothed (Kenney and Zeman 2002), unacclimated men and women. The present study extends these critical environmental heat stress limits to a novel population of heat-acclimated children.…”
Environmental limits for uncompensable heat stress, above which an imbalance between heat gain and heat loss forces body core temperature upward (i.e., the upper limits of the prescriptive zone), are unknown for children. To determine these limits, 7 lean and 7 obese 9- to 12-year-old heat-acclimated boys performed four randomized trials each on separate days to determine the critical water vapor pressure (Pcrit) forcing an upward inflection of body core temperature at several ambient temperatures. Subjects walked continuously on a treadmill at 30% maximal aerobic capacity at a constant dry bulb temperature (Tdb = 34, 36, 38 or 42°C). After a 30-min equilibration period at 9 torr, ambient water vapor pressure increased approximately 1 torr every 5-min until a distinct breakpoint in the core temperature versus time curve was evident. Compared to the lean subjects, obese subjects had significantly lower environmental limits (P < 0.03) in warm environments (Pcrit, for lean vs. obese, respectively = 32.9 ± 0.7 vs. 30.3 ± 0.8 torr at Tdb = 34°C; 29.6 ± 0.6 vs. 27.2 ± 0.9 torr at Tdb = 36°C; 27.8 ± 0.6 vs. 24.7 ± 0.9 torr at Tdb = 38°C; 25.5 ± 0.7 vs. 24.5 ± 1.5 torr at Tdb = 42°C). These results suggest that separate critical environmental guidelines should be tailored to lean and obese children exercising in the heat.
“…Clothing creates an additional resistance to vapor transport, which results in increased thermal strain from elevated body temperatures, thus reducing worker tolerance and, in extreme cases, posing the risk of overheat sickness (Joy and Goldman, 1968;Kenny et al, 1988;Bishop et al, 1988;Faff and Tutak, 1989;Nunneley, 1989;Sun et al, 2000;White et al, 1989). Evaporation of perspiration becomes the only heat-dissipating channel.…”
Section: Moisture Condensation and Deterioration Of Clothing Performancementioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.