2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychotic-like experiences and correlation with distress and depressive symptoms in a community sample of adolescents and young adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
205
5
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(238 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
25
205
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We may have combined relatively benign PLEs with pathological PLEs [i.e. PLEs with pronounced relationships with psychopathology Armando et al, 2010)]; however, this would have rendered the association between persisting PLEs and psychopathology harder to detect. Another potential limitation derives from our use of a categorical definition of externalising and internalising psychopathology outcomes which, despite being a clinically validated threshold, may have incurred a loss of measurement precision and misclassification of children whose subscale scores placed them in the 'borderline' SDQ range (approximating the top 11-20% of the population) of the internalising and externalising categories.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We may have combined relatively benign PLEs with pathological PLEs [i.e. PLEs with pronounced relationships with psychopathology Armando et al, 2010)]; however, this would have rendered the association between persisting PLEs and psychopathology harder to detect. Another potential limitation derives from our use of a categorical definition of externalising and internalising psychopathology outcomes which, despite being a clinically validated threshold, may have incurred a loss of measurement precision and misclassification of children whose subscale scores placed them in the 'borderline' SDQ range (approximating the top 11-20% of the population) of the internalising and externalising categories.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subclinical psychotic symptoms or psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) in childhood and adolescence are associated with concurrent emotional and behavioural difficulties (Laurens et al, 2007(Laurens et al, , 2012Nishida et al, 2008;Scott et al, 2009;Armando et al, 2010;Bartels-Velthuis et al, 2010;Polanczyk et al, 2010;Barragan et al, 2011;Kelleher et al, 2012b). PLEs that persist into adulthood increase risk for social dysfunction (Rossler et al, 2007), affective disturbance (van Rossum et al, 2011), substance misuse (Dhossche et al, 2002), and psychotic disorder .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a slightly older sample (12-16 years), using the positive subscale of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE; twenty self-report items), Wigman and colleagues [37] identified five underlying content types. These five types (hallucinations, delusions, paranoia, paranormal thinking (belief in telepathy and mind-reading), and grandiosity), have been broadly replicated by other studies of the CAPE in adolescents [38][39][40][41], and parallel distinctions found in clinical psychosis [42]. Hallucinations and paranoia appear more likely to be distressing and associated with current and future psychopathology [43,44], and there are preliminary suggestions that the role of schematic beliefs may vary according to UE content or type [32,34].…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The content/type variables represented the five factors of adolescent UEs derived from the CAPE: hallucinations, delusions, paranoia, paranormal thinking (belief in telepathy and mind-reading), and grandiosity. CAPE factors were based on endorsement ratings (to limit the influence of associated distress/severity) of the 20 positive psychotic symptom-like items [37][38][39][40][41]. Hallucinations, paranoia, and paranormal/telepathy items were identified straightforwardly by content.…”
Section: Unusual Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PDI-21 (Peters et al, 2004) is widely used as a measure of delusion proneness in clinical and non-clinical research on persecutory Moore et al 2006) and grandiose ideation (Armando et al, 2010;Jones & Fernyhough, 2007;Peters et al 1999;Scott et al, 2006;Verdoux, et al, 1998). The PDI -21 provides information on the total number of items endorsed (out of 21), total distress, preoccupation and conviction (a score of up to 105 for each dimension), and total delusional ideation (the sum of all scores which can be added up to 336).…”
Section: Pdi-21mentioning
confidence: 99%