1988
DOI: 10.1037/h0099561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychosocial rehabilitation: Toward a definition.

Abstract: Psychosocial rehabilitation is currently one of the leading approaches of caring for people with emotional disability and is currently gaining wide-ranging acceptance. Despite its rapid expansion, articulation of the model lacks an organized body of knowledge and, consequently, "psychosocial rehabilitation" has become a euphemism for numerous and often unrelated methods of care. In this paper, based on extensive literature review, a list of major psychosocial rehabilitation principles is presented. The aim is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(113 reference statements)
0
88
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The significance of empowerment as a program principle and client outcome has gained recognition in a variety of community-based mental health agencies (Berman-Rossi & Cohen, 1989;Cohen, 1989;McCarthy & Nelson, 1991;Runyan & Faria, 1992;Rosenfield & Neese-Todd, 1993). In particular, its underlying dimensions reflect the practice principles of client self-determination, client participation in agency management, resource and skills development, and environmental change that inform psychosocial rehabilitation programs (Anthony, Cohen, & Farkas, 1982;Cnaan et al, 1988Cnaan et al, , 1990Cohen, Anthony, & Farkas, 1991). The empowerment instruments provide in their item content a measure of the personal selfdetermination that consumers (and clients of community mental health organizations) may achieve and the organizational and community activities in which they may become involved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance of empowerment as a program principle and client outcome has gained recognition in a variety of community-based mental health agencies (Berman-Rossi & Cohen, 1989;Cohen, 1989;McCarthy & Nelson, 1991;Runyan & Faria, 1992;Rosenfield & Neese-Todd, 1993). In particular, its underlying dimensions reflect the practice principles of client self-determination, client participation in agency management, resource and skills development, and environmental change that inform psychosocial rehabilitation programs (Anthony, Cohen, & Farkas, 1982;Cnaan et al, 1988Cnaan et al, , 1990Cohen, Anthony, & Farkas, 1991). The empowerment instruments provide in their item content a measure of the personal selfdetermination that consumers (and clients of community mental health organizations) may achieve and the organizational and community activities in which they may become involved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors suggest that work-related activities could be destigmatizing. Work is seen as an essential and integral element of normalization (Cnaan et al, 1988) and the lack of productive roles enforces the negative attitudes against mentally restored people and their relapse (Long & Runck, 1983). Vocational rehabilitation is explicitly suggested as a destigmatization strategy because work stimulates the recovery of clients and because it reduces deviance (Kaasenbrood & De Valck, 2000).…”
Section: Service and Client Level Determinants Of Rejection Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Le processus est alors à poursuivre. Cnaan et al (1988) définissent la réadaptation comme un processus qui facilite le retour d'un individu à un niveau optimal de fonctionnement autonome dans la communauté. Depuis 30 ans, plusieurs programmes de réadaptation destinés à des personnes atteintes de schizophrénie ont été élaborés.…”
Section: Modèle De Gestion Du Stress Des Personnes Atteintes De Schizunclassified