1996
DOI: 10.1093/her/11.3.299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychosocial predictors of fruit and vegetable consumption among elementary school children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

9
119
3
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
9
119
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with past research showing that children are more likely to prefer and consume fruit than vegetables. [36][37][38] Consistent with previous research, social norms for FV were related to consumption. 21,22,39 The perceived social norms for FV at school could possibly influence FV consumption from the NSLP and snack bar.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is consistent with past research showing that children are more likely to prefer and consume fruit than vegetables. [36][37][38] Consistent with previous research, social norms for FV were related to consumption. 21,22,39 The perceived social norms for FV at school could possibly influence FV consumption from the NSLP and snack bar.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…With the range of correlation coefficients from 0.13 to 0.22, other studies have documented significant, yet weak relationships between FV selfefficacy and consumption. 19,36,38 Strategies to increase general FV self-efficacy should be investigated. As noted in Table 1, students reported higher self-efficacy for fruit than for vegetables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simple strategy of teaching these recommendations in elementary schools may be important to make daily intake more likely. Liking and preferences were also related to likelihood of daily intake of both fruit and vegetables, and such taste preferences have repeatedly been shown to be a good predictor of food choices (Domel et al, 1996;Resnicow et al, 1997;Lien et al, 2002;Neumark-Sztainer et al, 2003;Bere and Klepp, 2004). Repeated exposure to many different kinds of fruit and vegetables at early age might be a good strategy to improve liking (Wardle et al, 2003;Patrick and Nicklas, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Children who were confident that they can eat fruit or vegetables daily were one and a half time more likely to eat vegetables daily and more than two times more likely to eat fruit daily. The literature is inconsistent about the relationship between selfefficacy and fruit and vegetable intake (Domel et al, 1996;Resnicow et al, 1997;Reynolds et al, 1999;Lien et al, 2002;Young et al, 2004), probably owing to different possible operationalizations of the self-efficacy construct. Barriers were less consistently associated with daily intakes than general self-efficacy in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As knowledge, accessibility (9) and preferences (10)(11)(12) are important predictors of dietary intake among schoolchildren, interventions should target these potential mediators to maximise the likelihood of success (12,13) . School gardens have emerged as an innovative and potentially engaging strategy to improve vegetable intake among children as they increase students' exposure to vegetables, which may positively impact on attitudes, preferences and eating behaviours (5) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%