2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11292-012-9169-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychosocial functioning among inmates in prison-based drug treatment: results from Project BRITE

Abstract: Objective To assess the impact of a positive behavioral reinforcement intervention on psychosocial functioning of inmates over the course of treatment and on post-treatment self-reported measures of treatment participation, progress, and satisfaction. Method Male (n = 187) and female (n = 143) inmates participating in 12-week prison-based Intensive Outpatient (IOP) drug treatment were randomly assigned to receive standard treatment (ST) or standard treatment plus positive behavioral reinforcement (BR) for en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This study, combined with our earlier findings (Prendergast et al, 2008; Hall et al, 2009) and those of others (Letourneau, McCart, Asuzu, Mauro, & Sheidow, 2013; Marlowe et al, 2008) involving a variety of criminal justice populations, seem to indicate that CM does not result in sustained abstinence or improved attendance with offenders. In a study evaluating the use of incentives in a prison-based treatment program (Burdon, De Lore, Dang, Warda, & Prendergast, 2013), the results showed little evidence of a consistent and strong impact of incentives on during-treatment measures of psychosocial functioning and treatment participation. The results of that study indicated that the intervention affected female and male participants differently and with some variables in the opposite direction of what was expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study, combined with our earlier findings (Prendergast et al, 2008; Hall et al, 2009) and those of others (Letourneau, McCart, Asuzu, Mauro, & Sheidow, 2013; Marlowe et al, 2008) involving a variety of criminal justice populations, seem to indicate that CM does not result in sustained abstinence or improved attendance with offenders. In a study evaluating the use of incentives in a prison-based treatment program (Burdon, De Lore, Dang, Warda, & Prendergast, 2013), the results showed little evidence of a consistent and strong impact of incentives on during-treatment measures of psychosocial functioning and treatment participation. The results of that study indicated that the intervention affected female and male participants differently and with some variables in the opposite direction of what was expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partindo disso, pode-se considerar que as intervenções acima citadas abordam a garantia de direitos e humanização da pena (ONU, 2015) através de aspectos atinentes aos processos de saúde e doença. Considerando uma perspectiva cronológica, faz sentido que a realização de tais intervenções deveriam anteceder a ocorrência das intervenções focadas em reabilitação psicossocial (Burdon et al, 2013;Hunter et al, 2016;Morgan et al, 2014;Pettus-Davis et al, 2016). Chama atenção que tais intervenções foram avaliadas a partir de uma perspectiva eminentemente qualitativa e apresentaram resultados promissores, tendo sido avaliadas de forma positiva pelos participantes.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Foram localizados quatro estudos (Burdon et al, 2013;Hunter et al, 2016;Morgan et al, 2014;Pettus-Davis et al, 2016) sobre intervenções focadas na reinserção e reabilitação psicossocial. Morgan et al (2014) avaliaram o programa Transformando Vidas e Mudando Resultados, desenvolvido nos Estados Unidos, em uma prisão psiquiátrica.…”
Section: Reinserção Social E Reabilitação Psicossocialunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Homework assignments (e.g., tracking of distress reactions, practicing new coping responses, and creating depictions of their potential future prosocial lifestyle) supplement in‐group discussions and encourage participants to use the model outside sessions with custody staff, other inmates, family, and significant others. Fifth, in the final session activity, participants recognized others' contribution to the session with stickers of cartoon characters and positive sayings as a behavioral reinforcer and contingency management device (Burdon, St. De Lore, Dang, Warda, & Prendergast, ). Participants also completed an instrument that facilitators used to assess and monitor participants' distress symptoms present at the end of the session.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%