1992
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800791025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychomotor testing and the ability to perform an anastomosis in junior surgical trainees

Abstract: Ten junior surgical trainees underwent objective testing of manual dexterity and visuospatial ability and were required to carry out five consecutive anastomoses on fresh porcine jejunum. Anastomoses were scored by a single observer and a cumulative error score (CES) derived for each procedure. In the first anastomosis there was little correlation between the psychomotor test results and the anastomosis scores. In subsequent trials there were significant negative correlations between aspects of manual dexterit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 -11 Other criteria such as stress tolerance and tests of visuospatial abilities have demonstrated better correlation. [12][13][14] Directly testing procedural skills through computer simulations may offer a more reliable measure of one's ability to perform specific tasks. 15 For simulators to gain acceptance into training programs, they need to be evaluated for their efficacy in teaching and evaluating procedural skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 -11 Other criteria such as stress tolerance and tests of visuospatial abilities have demonstrated better correlation. [12][13][14] Directly testing procedural skills through computer simulations may offer a more reliable measure of one's ability to perform specific tasks. 15 For simulators to gain acceptance into training programs, they need to be evaluated for their efficacy in teaching and evaluating procedural skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correlations with surgical performance for this factor differ. Tests for this factor show positive correlations with surgical performance in some research (Gibbons, Baker, & Skinner, 1986;Steele, Walder, & Herbert, 1992) but not in others (Luursema et al, 2010;Schueneman et al, 1984). 5.…”
Section: Visuospatial Abilitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Similarly, several studies have demonstrated a correlation between surgical skills and performance on the embedded figures test (Witkin, Oltman, & Karp, 1971), which measures the ability to distinguish 2D shapes within complex visual backgrounds (Gibbons, Baker, & Skinner, 1986;Gibbons, Gudas, & Gibbons, 1983;Steele, Walder, & Herbert, 1992). Using a comprehensive battery of psychometric tests, Schueneman and colleagues identified a cluster of cognitive functions underlying a factor that they labelled complex visuo-spatial organization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%