1991
DOI: 10.1093/bja/66.3.345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychomotor Recovery After Outpatient Anaesthesia: Individual Impairment May Be Masked by Group Analysis

Abstract: Recovery from outpatient anaesthesia with propofol was followed in 10 patients, using a semantic recognition memory test (SemRT) (in a new implementation on a Psion hand-held microcomputer), choice reaction time (CRT) and critical flicker fusion threshold (CFFT). Group analysis of results revealed an effect on psychomotor performance as measured by the SemRT and CFFT (but not the CRT), 30 min after the end of the procedure. Performance on all three tasks had returned to baseline values within 60 min of complet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no evidence of significant residual psychomotor impairment at 48 h. Whilst the outcome accords with the sole earlier finding that impairment of children's postanaesthetic cognition had resolved within 24 h [1], both results must be interpreted cautiously because we have shown in the context of adult anaesthetic recovery that analyses based on group‐mean performance will tend to mask individual residual impairment [17]. Individual impairment can be estimated from statistical procedures including the use of standard scores and the construction of confidence intervals based on control group performance [6, 18–20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…There was no evidence of significant residual psychomotor impairment at 48 h. Whilst the outcome accords with the sole earlier finding that impairment of children's postanaesthetic cognition had resolved within 24 h [1], both results must be interpreted cautiously because we have shown in the context of adult anaesthetic recovery that analyses based on group‐mean performance will tend to mask individual residual impairment [17]. Individual impairment can be estimated from statistical procedures including the use of standard scores and the construction of confidence intervals based on control group performance [6, 18–20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…For example, subject 28 demonstrated a wide range of results but his plasma propofol concentrations were within the range for his group. It is apparent that considerable variation may occur amongst individuals which may be masked by the analysis of the group as a whole [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other test consisted of a choice reaction time (CRT) which was measured using a programme implemented on a hand-held Psion organizer. 8 Before the CRT test itself, preliminary instructions scroll across the screen, prompted by key presses by the patient. The final message is "Are you ready?-press the Y key to go on".…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%