2003
DOI: 10.1026//0012-1924.49.1.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometrische Analysen von IIP und Neo-FFI bei Straftätern

Abstract: Zusammenfassung. Über die Testgütekriterien von Fragebogenverfahren bei ihrer Anwendung an Straftäterstichproben ist wenig bekannt. In der vorliegenden Arbeit werden zwei Studien im Maßregelvollzug (N = 102) und im Regelvollzug (N = 91) vorgestellt, in denen das Inventar zur Erfassung Interpersonaler Probleme (IIP) und das Neo-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar (Neo-FFI) hinsichtlich ihrer Reliabilität und Validität untersucht wurden. Wie die Ergebnisse zeigen, lassen sich Zuverlässigkeit und Modellstruktur der Verfahren … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, all respondents had been conscientiously informed about the status of the study, and they were ensured that all responses would be anonymous. Previous results showed (Kunst & Hoyer, 2003) that such a strategy leads to a reliability and validity pattern of data from offenders that cannot be discriminated from general population samples. Finally, one restriction of these studies is that they were only based on self-report information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, all respondents had been conscientiously informed about the status of the study, and they were ensured that all responses would be anonymous. Previous results showed (Kunst & Hoyer, 2003) that such a strategy leads to a reliability and validity pattern of data from offenders that cannot be discriminated from general population samples. Finally, one restriction of these studies is that they were only based on self-report information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sentence duration ranged from 1 to 244 months (M = 47.0 months, SD = 44.9). Kunst and Hoyer (2003) have described the sample and procedure of this study in more detail. Informed written consent was obtained from all individuals prior to their participation.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dennison, Stough, & Birgden, 2001). More specifically, male prisoners score higher on Neuroticism and lower on Extraversion and Openness than the general male population sample (Kunst & Hoyer, 2003). Thus, the configuration of the personality dimension that constitutes the resilient prototype is less likely to be found in samples of prisoners or offenders.…”
Section: Sample Size and Sample Composition As Crucial Issues In Protmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Normative data for neuroticism are available from a population-based sample of 966 German males (M = 1.66, SD = 0.67). Reliability and factor structure of the NEO-FFI have been replicated in a forensic sample of sexual offenders (Kunst & Hoyer, 2003).…”
Section: Emotional Deficitsmentioning
confidence: 99%