2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04026.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric testing of compliance with universal precautions scale in clinical nursing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, Lam et al . ). Validity is the extent to which the interpretations of the results of a test are warranted, which depends on the particular use the test is intended to serve (Kimberlin & Winterstein ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…, Lam et al . ). Validity is the extent to which the interpretations of the results of a test are warranted, which depends on the particular use the test is intended to serve (Kimberlin & Winterstein ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…() and Lam et al . (), who used the UP compliance instrument previously elaborated by Chan et al . ().…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The sample size was estimated on the basis of previous similar validation studies. 9 For the cross-cultural pilot testing and relevance check, delegates of a conference were invited as participants. At the 15th International Congress of Infectious Diseases, organized by the International Society for Infectious Diseases in 2012, experts from different countries (ie, delegates of the conference) on infectious diseases and infection control were invited via convenience sampling.…”
Section: Samples and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%