Psychometric properties of the Russian version of the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale-Short Form

Ларионов, Павел; Ageenkova, Ekaterina; Belashina, T.V.

doi:10.14412/2074-2711-2021-2-26-33

Cited by 6 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 6 publications

(14 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Considering the fact that emotional reactivity traits refer to rather stable individual differences (Becerra, Campitelli, 2013;Preece et al, 2019), it can be concluded that these emotional reactivity traits may predispose to mental health disorders. These results are also consistent with other studies on emotional reactivity (Larionov et al, 2021). Overall, our results showed that negative-intensity was the most valuable predictor of stress, depressive and anxiety symptoms among the examined variables (positive and negative emotional reactivity traits and emotion regulation strategies).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

“…1. The Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale-Short Form (PERS-S), developed by Preece, Becerra and Campitelli (2019), in the Russian version by Larionov, Ageenkova and Belashina (2021), was used. The PERS-S is an 18-item selfreport questionnaire designed to measure three characteristics of emotional reactivity, namely activation, intensity, and duration of positive and negative emotions, separately.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Towards Psychosomatic Medicine: The Role of Age and Emotional Characteristics in People with Psychosomatic Disorders

Ларионов

Агеенкова²,

Dedenok³

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Studying the emotional characteristics in people with psychosomatic disorders (PSD) at the early stages of disease development is a topical research area in psychosomatic medicine, as it allows clarifying the psychological mechanisms of PSD formation. This exploratory research aims to study the age features of emotional characteristics in people with and without PSD. The study was carried out on a sample of 200 people aged 18-55 (M = 26.89; SD = 7.82) using the following questionnaires: the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale-Short Form (PERS-S), the Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10), the Rumination subscale from the Cognitive Emotion Regulation questionnaire (CERq), the Emotion Regulation questionnaire and the Patient health questionnaire-4 (Phq-4). The results showed that the levels of stress, depressive and anxiety symptoms decrease with age. Ease/speed of activation, intensity, and duration of negative emotions, as well as rumination on stressful situations, are positively correlated with the level of stress, depressive and anxiety symptoms. With an increase in positive emotion duration, the severity of mental symptoms decreases. Compared to people aged 26-55 with or without PSD, young people aged 18-25 and especially young people with PSD have a more unfavorable psychosomatic status, which is characterized by a more explicit tendency to experience negative emotions with their higher intensity and duration. Emotion regulation difficulties

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards Psychosomatic Medicine: The Role of Age and Emotional Characteristics in People with Psychosomatic Disorders

Ларионов

Агеенкова²,

Dedenok³

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We used the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale – Short Form (Preece et al, 2019; Russian version by Larionov et al, 2021) to assess reactivity for positive and negative emotions. It has two total scales for positive (α = .86) and negative (α = .89) emotions, each consisting of three subscales: activation (for positive emotions α = .74, for negative emotions α = .78), intensity (for positive emotions α = .71, for negative emotions α = .78), and duration (for positive emotions α = .77, for negative emotions α = .78).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Relationship Between Interpersonal Sensitivity and Emotion Regulation in Youths

Razvaliaeva,

Polskaya

2023

European Journal of Psychology Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: In clinical psychology, interpersonal sensitivity is defined as a vulnerability to perceived signs of rejection in interpersonal situations; it plays an important role in the development of psychopathology, especially mood disorders. We investigated the relationship between interpersonal sensitivity, emotion-regulation strategies, and emotional reactivity in a group of youths without mental health issues. Method: Participants ( N = 231, 46 men, 185 women, 18–25 years old) were recruited from online groups focusing on education, social activism, and psychological self-help. Measures: Interpersonal Sensitivity Measure, Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale, and Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Results: Negative emotional reactivity predicted all dimensions of interpersonal sensitivity. Positive emotional reactivity negatively predicted fear of rejection and dependence on the opinion of others. Only expressive suppression predicted the fear of rejection. Activation and intensity of negative emotions moderated the link between expressive suppression and fear of rejection. The Interpersonal Sensitivity subscales predicted negative emotional reactivity and expressive suppression. Discussion: The present study corroborates and broadens the results of previous studies that utilized rejection sensitivity – a narrower construct than interpersonal sensitivity. Expressive suppression and emotional reactivity emerge as differential predictors of individual dimensions of interpersonal sensitivity.

show abstract

“…It should be stressed that the 6-factor model fits the intended subscale structure of the PERS-S, and has the best fit indices in most papers, including the research on the original version ( Preece et al, 2019 ) and the Russian version of the scale ( Larionov et al, 2021 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The results reported by Becerra et al (2019) evidenced that age was not related to ER. Some studies showed that females had more negative ER traits than males ( Becerra et al, 2019 ; Larionov et al, 2021 ). In a study which used the PERS-S, the researchers Preece et al (2019) noted that activation, intensity, and duration of negative emotions and general negative ER positively correlated with emotion regulation difficulties as well as with expressive suppression, and negatively correlated with cognitive reappraisal.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of activation, intensity and duration of positive and negative emotions: psychometric properties of the Polish version of the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale – Short Form

Ларионов¹,

Mudło-Głagolska²

2022

Current Issues in Personality Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale – Short Form (PERS-S) is an 18-item self-report questionnaire that assesses emo-tional reactivity. The PERS-S measures activation, intensity, and duration of negative and positive emotions. The study aims to validate the Polish version of the PERS-S.Participants and procedureThe study was performed on a sample of 675 people aged 18-80 (M = 28.88, SD = 13.17, 56.15% female). The factor structure and measurement invariance across gender, age and educational categories were verified with confirmato-ry factor analysis. Convergent and divergent validity were assessed based on the relationship between the PERS-S scale and the Emotional Reactivity scale taken from the Formal Characteristics of Behaviour–Temperament Invento-ry, the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, the Perceived Stress Scale, the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale and the Subjective Vitality Scale.ResultsThe intended 6-factor model was an excellent fit for the data (CFI = .963; TLI = .953; RMSEA = .053, 90% CI [.046; .061]; SRMR = .057) and was invariant across gender, educational level and age groups. All PERS-S subscales corre-lated with another emotional reactivity questionnaire, stress, emotion regulation strategies, well-being and vitality as expected. The reliability was high for all subscales (α > .70); it was slightly lower only for the positive-activation sub-scale (α = .68). Due to gender differences in emotional reactivity traits, group norms (sten scale) were calculated sep-arately for females and males.ConclusionsThe Polish version of the PERS-S has strong psychometric properties. Its practical applications are discussed.

show abstract

Psychometric properties of the Russian version of the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale-Short Form

Cited by 6 publications

References 6 publications

Towards Psychosomatic Medicine: The Role of Age and Emotional Characteristics in People with Psychosomatic Disorders

Towards Psychosomatic Medicine: The Role of Age and Emotional Characteristics in People with Psychosomatic Disorders

The Relationship Between Interpersonal Sensitivity and Emotion Regulation in Youths

Assessment of activation, intensity and duration of positive and negative emotions: psychometric properties of the Polish version of the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale – Short Form

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About